SPECIFICITY OF BEHAVIOUR MORAL CONTENT IN THE TOTAL VOLUME OF BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
Ignatyuk Yuliya Leonidovna, Chumlyakov Kirill Stanislavovich
Tyumen State University
Industrial University of Tyumen
Submitted: 21.03.2019
Abstract. The article is devoted to the philosophical and ethical understanding of the specificity of human behaviour moral content in the course of business communication in the modern society. Special attention is paid to moral issues, and from this point of view the topic of the research is revealed, the basis of which is the study of the essence of a person’s moral content in its behavioural embodiment, as well as the specificity of a person’s formation as a subject of moral self-determination. The characteristic features of moral behaviour are singled out and described, and the criteria for a person’s moral value in business communication are substantiated.
Key words and phrases: деловое общение, нравственность, мораль, моральное сознание личности, нравственное содержание поведения, благо, критерий, личность, business communication, morality, personality’s moral consciousness, moral content of behaviour, good, criterion, personality
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Antsyferova L. I. Svyaz' moral'nogo soznaniya s nravstvennym povedeniem cheloveka (po materialam issledovanii Lourensa Kolberga i ego shkoly) // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1999. T. 20. № 3. S. 5-17.
Zotov N. D. Lichnost' kak sub"ekt nravstvennoi aktivnosti: priroda i stanovlenie. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 1984. 247 s.
Ignatyuk Yu. L. Rol' blaga v sisteme kul'tury: monografiya. Tyumen': Tyumenskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya mirovoi ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, 2011. 92 c.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti. M.: Mysl', 1999. 1472 s.
Kupreichenko A. B., Molodykh E. N. Otsenki organizatsionnoi kul'tury u sotrudnikov s razlichnym otnosheniem k soblyudeniyu nravstvennykh norm delovogo povedeniya // Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya. 2011. T. 1. № 1. S. 24-38.
Pavlova L. G., Kashaeva E. Yu. Nravstvennye ustanovki i eticheskie normy kak faktory effektivnosti delovogo obshcheniya // Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski. 2014. № 2. S. 182-192.
Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1975. T. 2. 421 s.
Trofimova N. B., Zhukova A. M. Pozitsiya lichnosti kak osnovopolagayushchii kriterii nravstvennogo povedeniya studentov // Izvestiya Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2016. № 1 (270). S. 58-61.
Utembaeva M. M. Kul'turnye i nravstvennye tsennosti: aspekty delovoi mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii // Vestnik Sochinskogo instituta mody, biznesa i prava. 2017. № 1. S. 199-204.
Payne S. L. Challenges for research ethics and moral knowledge construction in the applied social sciences // Journal of Business Ethics. 2000. Vol. 26. № 4. P. 307-318.
Русский
