SEMIOTIC MECHANISM OF HETEROTOPY (IN RELATION TO SCIENCE ART)
Popova Ol'ga Viktorovna
Saratov State Conservatory
Submitted: 02.03.2019
Abstract. The article continues a series of publications devoted to the problem of heterotopy in art. The author considers heterotopy as a social-spatial and linguistic phenomenon. The analysis is based on the conception of heterotopy as a semiotic system, which manifests specific correlation between the signifier and the signified. The research is focused on the artistic practices of Science Art. The findings allow the author to conclude that heterotopy aims to create an alternative worldview, which is achieved by the mechanisms of hybridization, synthesis, re-designation and object transfer from one space into another.
Key words and phrases: современное искусство, гетеротопия, М. Фуко, механизмы гетеротопизации, постмодернистская методология, modern art, heterotopy, M. Foucault, heterotopization mechanisms, post-modernistic methodology
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bart R. Mif segodnya // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika. M.: Progress; Univers, 1994. S. 72-130.
Bezzubova O. V. "Drugie prostranstva" Mishelya Fuko: sovremennye strategii interpretatsii // Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2011. № 2 (27). S. 199-204.
Bol'shakova L. Kognitivnyi mekhanizm sozdaniya vizual'noi metafory (na materiale angloyazychnykh muzykal'nykh klipov) // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2008. № 2. S. 119-123.
V Muzee sovremennogo iskusstva pokazali vystavku "Demony v mashine" [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://tvkultura. ru/article/show/article_id/295745/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.03.2019).
Kormer V. F. O karnavalizatsii kak genezise "dvoinogo soznaniya" // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. № 9. S. 179-180.
Kul'kina V. M. Prostranstvo geterotopii kak spetsificheskaya semioticheskaya sistema // Yazykovoe bytie cheloveka i etnosa: materialy XIII Berezinskikh chtenii (g. Moskva, 15 maya 2017 g.). M.: INION RAN, 2017. Vyp. 19. S. 133-137.
Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. M.: USSR, 2004. 256 s.
Levchenko O. E. Osvoenie prirody sredstvami sains-arta: "estestvennoe" i tekhnologicheskoe: avtoref. diss. … k. filos. n. M., 2016. 26 s.
Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2009. 704 s.
Popova O. V. Geterotopii v iskusstve: sluchai bioarta // Manuskript. 2019. T. 12. Vyp. 2. C. 143-147.
Popova O. V. Metafora kak kognitivnoe sredstvo sozdaniya vizual'noi obraznosti // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Gumanitarnye nauki". 2017. № 7 (256). Vyp. 33. S. 194-198.
Fuko M. Drugie prostranstva // Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu / pod red. V. P. Bol'shakova. M.: Praksis, 2006. Ch. 3. S. 191-205.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. M.: Progress, 1977. 400 s.
Shestakova E. G. Geterotopiya - rabochee ponyatie sovremennoi gumanitaristiki: literaturovedcheskii aspekt // Kritika i semiotika. 2014. № 1. S. 58-72.
Shtepa V. I., Erokhin S. V., Gagarin V. E. Napravleniya nauchnogo iskusstva: bioart // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. № 12 (62). Ch. 3. S. 201-209.
Evolyutsiya ot kutyur: iskusstvo i nauka v epokhu postbiologii: v 2-kh ch. / sost. i obshch. red. D. Bulatova. Kaliningrad: BF GTsSI, 2013. Ch. 1. 196 s.
Русский
