Yachin Sergei Evgen’evich, Kokhan Irina Nikolaevna
Far Eastern Federal University
Submitted: 06.12.2018
Abstract. In the light of M. Heidegger’s hermeneutic ontology, the article reveals the role of conjunctions as parts of speech in understanding the essence of a human language. In contrast to the traditional, mainly syntactic understanding of conjunctions in linguistics, it is proposed to consider them in the semantic and cognitive aspect. It is found out that conjunctions are responsible for the conceivability of "pure" relations as reality of a special kind. The authors substantiate the thesis that it is the presence of conjunctions that characterizes the specificity of a human language, its poetic, constructive force. The significance of conjunctions is revealed in semantic, syntactic, pragmatic and cognitive dimensions.
Key words and phrases: мышление, язык, универсалии языка, части речи, союзы, лингвистическая типология, thinking, language, language universals, parts of speech, conjunctions, linguistic typology
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Burlak S. Proiskhozhdenie yazyka. Fakty, issledovaniya, gipotezy. M.: Corpus, 2011. 464 c.
Vezhbitskaya A. Semanticheskie universalii i opisanie yazykov. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1999. XII+780 s.
Kubryakova E. S. Yazyk i znanie. Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke. Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol' yazyka v poznanii mira / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t yazykoznaniya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2004. 560 c.
Kumakhov M. A. O strukture predlozheniya v yazykakh polisinteticheskogo tipa // Universalii i tipologicheskie issledovaniya. Meshchaninovskie chteniya. M.: Nauka, 1974. S. 125-134.
Fillmor Ch. Delo o padezhe otkryvaetsya vnov' [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://scicenter.online/obschaya-lingvistika-scicenter/fillmor-delo-padeje-otkryivaetsya-vnov-162322.html (data obrashcheniya: 29.08.2018).
Florenskii P. Ikonostas. Izbrannye trudy po iskusstvu. SPb.: Mifril; Russkaya kniga, 1993. 365 s.
Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya. M.: Ad Marginem, 1997. 452 c.
Khaidegger M. Pis'mo o gumanizme // Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: stat'i i vystupleniya. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 192-220.
Khaidegger M. Tozhdestvo i razlichie. M.: Gnozis; Logos, 1997. 64 s.
Khaidegger M. Chto znachit myslit'? // Khaidegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoi doroge. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991. S. 134-145.
Yakobson R. Yazyk i bessoznatel'noe / per. s angl., fr. K. Golubovich, D. Epifanova, D. Krotovoi, K. Chukhrukidze, V. Shevoroshkina; sost., vstup. slovo K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze; red. per. F. Uspenskii. M.: Gnozis, 1996. 248 s.
Yachin S. E. Slovo i fenomen. M.: Smysl, 2006. 145 s.
Agamben G. Infancy and History. The Destruction of Experience. L. - N. Y.: Verso, 1993. 176 p.
Bollegala D., Maehara T. K. Embedding Semantic Relations into Word Representations // Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2015. Liverpool, 2015. P. 1222-1228.
Bumford D. Universal quantification as iterated conjunction [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://events.illc.uva.nl/AC/ AC2013/uploaded_files/inlineitem/09_Bumford.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 31.08.2018).
Carston R. Conjunction and pragmatic effects // The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics: in 10 vols. Oxford: The Pergamon Press, 1994. Vol. 2. P. 692-698.
Dingwall W. O. Secondary Conjunction and Universal Grammar. DOI: 10.1080/08351816909389117 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351816909389117 (data obrashcheniya: 31.08.2018).
Fillmore C. The Case for Case [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED019631.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 29.08.2018).
Greenberg J. H. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements // Universals of Language / ed. by J. H. Greenberg. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1963. P. 73-113.
Greenberg J. H., Ferguson Ch. A., Moravcsik E. A. Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1978. 463 p.
Hetland J., Molnar V. Structures of focus and grammatical relations. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2003. 260 p.
Limbach J., Ruckteschell K. von. Die Macht der Sprache. Eine philosophisch-soziologische Reflexion // Langenscheidt KG / Goethe-Institut. M?nchen, 2008. S. 18-22.
Rooth M., Barbara H. Conjunction type ambiguity and wide scope "or" // Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. University of California, 1982. P. 353-362.
Schleppe?rell M. J. Conjunctions in Spoken English and ESL Writing // Applied Linguistics. 1996. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 202-213.
Unubi A. S. Conjunctions in English: Meaning, Types and Uses // International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research. 2016. Vol. 4. Iss. 3. P. 202-213.
Uryson E. V. Conjunctions, Contextualizers, and Syntax Theory. Studies in Applied Linguistics. Issue 1 // Studie z Aplikovan? Lingvistiky. 2013. Vol. 7. Iss. 2. P. 7-20.
Wierzbicka A. Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt a/M: Athen?um-Verlag, 1972. 235 p.
Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, Japanese [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://npu.edu.ua/!e-book/book/djvu/A/iif_kgpm_0195088360.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 29.08.2018).
Русский
