GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2019. № 12. P. 149-152.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2019.12.27

REALISM VERSUS CONSTRUCTIVISM IN THE CONTEXT OF KNOWLEDGE OBJECTIVITY PROBLEM
Rakhmatullin Rafael' Yusupovich, Atazhanova Aliya Alimovna, Nazarov Timur Zufarovich
Bashkir State Agrarian University
Submitted: 13.11.2019
Abstract. The article aims to justify integrity of the objective and the subjective in cognition by solving contradiction between realism and constructivism. Realism, having evolved from na?ve to hypothetic, comes to recognize the constructivist conception of discrepancy between our knowledge of the world and the world itself. Constructivism recognizes existence of the objective world but can’t solve the problem of genesis of psyche structures that arrange information about the world into a world picture. This problem can be solved from the viewpoint of the fractal conception and Jung’s archetype model based on existence of generative structures that arrange the objective and subjective world. From this viewpoint, contradiction between realism and constructivism disappears, knowledge is considered as synthesis of the objective and the subjective, with dominance of the first element.
Key words and phrases: реализм, наивный реализм, конструктивизм, солипсизм, априоризм, фрактал, архетип, realism, na?ve realism, constructivism, solipsism, apriorism, fractal, archetype
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Aristotel'. Sochineniya: v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1981. T. 3. 613 s.
  2. Diogen Laertskii. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov. M.: Mysl', 1979. 620 s.
  3. Dobrokhotov A. L. Realizm // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki / pod red. I. T. Kasavina. M.: Kanon+; ROOI "Reabilitatsiya", 2009.
  4. Zalevskaya A. A. Integrativnyi podkhod k probleme znaka v trudakh Ch. S. Pirsa // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Filologiya". 2017. № 4. S. 14-21.
  5. Il'enkov E. V. Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 464 s.
  6. Kant I. Sochineniya: v 8-mi t. M.: Choro, 1994. T. 3. Kritika chistogo razuma / per. N. O. Losskogo. 741 s.
  7. Kasavin I. T. Konstruktivizm // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki / pod red. I. T. Kasavina. M.: Kanon+; ROOI "Reabilitatsiya", 2009. S. 373-377.
  8. Kolpakov G. Linux okazalsya bakteriei [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.gazeta.ru/science/2013/04/03_a_ 5237373.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 11.11.2019).
  9. Levin G. D. Realizm ob otnoshenii soznaniya k bytiyu // Voprosy filosofii. 2016. № 8. S. 138-149.
  10. Mandel'brot B. Fraktaly i khaos. M. - Izhevsk: Regulyarnaya i khaotichnaya dinamika, 2009. 391 s.
  11. Mur Dzh. Oproverzhenie idealizma // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik. M.: Nauka, 1987. S. 247-285.
  12. Rakhmatullin R. Yu. Pozitivizm kak pervaya filosofiya nauki // Vestnik VEGU. 2014. № 6 (74). S. 150-159.
  13. Rakhmatullin R. Yu. Fraktal'naya kontseptsiya tvorchestva // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. № 7. S. 151-153.
  14. Rakhmatullin R. Yu., Semenova E. R. Genezis epistemologicheskogo konstruktivizma v evropeiskoi filosofii // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 4 (66). Ch. 1. S. 151-153.
  15. Rorti R. Analiticheskaya i transformativnaya filosofiya // Filosofskii zhurnal. 2018. T. 11. № 3. S. 5-19.
  16. Smirnov G. A., Gaidenko V. P. Granitsy tomistskoi epistemologii: Foma Akvinskii o bogopoznanii // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik / In-t filosofii RAN. M.: Nauka, 2009. S. 51-79.
  17. Talanov V. M. Strukturnoe skhodstvo znakovykh sistem (k postanovke problemy o edinom metayazyke kul'tury) // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Severokavkazskii region. Seriya "Tekhnicheskie nauki". 2007. № S. S. 156-167.
  18. Talanov V. M. Sushchestvuet li edinyi universal'nyi yazyk kul'tury? // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2009. № 1. S. 92-93.
  19. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M.: Nauka, 1998. 751 s.
  20. Foma Akvinskii. Izbrannye voprosy // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik. M.: Nauka, 2009. S. 80-101.
  21. Yung K. G. Struktura psikhiki i protsess individuatsii. M.: Nauka, 1996. 269 s.
  22. Alexander S. Space, Time and Deity. N. Y.: The Humanities Press, 1920. 437 p.
  23. Glasersfeld E. von. Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. L.: Falmer Press, 1995. 213 p.
  24. Holt E. B., Marvin W. T., Montague W. P., Perry R. B., Pitkin W. B., Spaulding E. G. The New Realism. Cooperative Studies in Philosophy. N. Y.: The Macmillan Company, 1912. 491 p.
  25. Popper K. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972. 390 p.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru