GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2019. № 10. P. 147-152.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2019.10.28

A. SCHOPENHAUER AND M. HEIDEGGER ON THE PHENOMENON OF BOREDOM: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Kornienko Aleksei Gennadievich
Saint Petersburg University


Submitted: 16.08.2019
Abstract. The article tackles the problem of interpreting the phenomenon of boredom in A. Schopenhauer’s and M. Heidegger’s works. This problem has not been previously investigated by domestic and foreign researchers. Analysing A. Schopenhauer’s views on the nature of boredom in the context of his metaphysical conception of will as a "thing in itself" and M. Heidegger’s interpretation of boredom as a fundamental mood, the researcher identifies evident similarities as well as historical and philosophical parallels in their interpretations.
Key words and phrases: скука, время, негативное удовольствие, страх, ужас, фундаментальное настроение, негативность Dasein, boredom, time, negative pleasure, fear, horror, fundamental mood, negativity, Dasein
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Kant I. Antropologiya s pragmaticheskoi tochki zreniya // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6-ti t. M.: Mysl', 1966. T. 6. S. 350-588.
  2. Khaidegger M. Bytie i Vremya / per. s nem. V. V. Bibikhin. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2013. 460 s.
  3. Khaidegger M. Osnovnye ponyatiya metafiziki. Mir - Konechnost' - Odinochestvo / per. s nem. V. V. Bibikhina, A. V. Akhutina, A. P. Shurbeleva. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2013. 591 s.
  4. Shopengauer A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6-ti t. / per. s nem.; pod red. A. Chanysheva. M.: TERRA - Knizhnyi klub; Respublika, 2001. T. 1. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie. 560 s.
  5. Ciocan C. Heidegger and the Problem of Boredom // Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 2010. Vol. 41. № 1. January. P. 64-77.
  6. D?rendahl R. ?ber die Bedeutung der Langeweile in Schopenhauers erstem Band der Welt als Wille und Vorstellung von 1819 // Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch. 2001. Bd. 82. S. 11-29.
  7. Gro?e J. Philosophie der Langeweile. Weimar: Springer-Verlag GmbH, 2008. 199 S.
  8. Guyer P. Pleasure and Knowledge in Schopenhauer’s Aesthetics // Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts / ed. by D. Jacquette. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1996. R. 109-133.
  9. Hu?bscher A. Schopenhauer und Existenzphilosophie. Zur Er?ffnung der Wissenschaftlichen Tagung // Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch. 1962. Bd. 43. S. 3-4.
  10. Kessel M. Langeweile: zum Umgang mit Zeit und Gef?hlen in Deutschland vom sp?ten 18. bis zum fr?hen 20. Jahrhundert. G?ttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2001. 411 S.
  11. Salaquarda J. Charakter und Freiheit. ?ber Problematik und ,Wahrheit‘ einer These Schopenhauers // Die Deutung der Welt. J?rg Salaquardas Schriften zu Arthur Schopenhauer / hrsg. von K. Broese, M. Ko?ler, B. Salaquarda. W?rzburg: K?nigshausen & Neumann, 2007. S. 161-169.
  12. Vandenabeele B. Schopenhauer on the Values of Aesthetic Experience // The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2007. Vol. XLV. P. 565-582.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru