MARGINALITY AS A FACTOR OF SOCIO-CULTURAL DYNAMICS
Mukhamedzhanova Nuriya Mansurovna
Orenburg State University
Submitted: 24.10.2018
Abstract. The article studies marginals’ role in socio-cultural dynamics. The author argues that marginalization, minimal in the traditional society and increasing in the transitional periods of history, can contribute to both the upward and downward dynamics of the society. On the one hand, marginalization provides for variability and renewal of culture. On the other hand, it becomes a factor of destabilization, when social groups that are limited in their ability to realize themselves using conventional methods are forced to create new mechanisms for their self-realization, including illegal ones.
Key words and phrases: маргинализация, социокультурная динамика, традиционное общество, старообрядчество, модернизация, интеллигенция, качественное образование, самореализация, marginalization, socio-cultural dynamics, traditional society, Old Belief, modernization, intelligentsia, quality education, self-realization
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Berdyaev N. A. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma // Berdyaev N. A. Sochineniya. M.: Raritet, 1994. S. 245-412.
Vorontsova L., Filatov S. Staroobryadchestvo: v poiskakh poteryannogo grada Kitezha // Religiya i obshchestvo: ocherki religioznoi zhizni sovremennoi Rossii / otv. red. i sost. S. B. Filatov. M. - SPb.: Letnii sad, 2002. S. 247-267.
Gorin D. G. Prostranstvo i vremya v dinamike rossiiskoi tsivilizatsii. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003. 280 s.
Zarubina N. N. Sotsiologiya khozyaistvennoi zhizni: problemnyi analiz v global'noi perspektive: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Universitetskaya kniga; Logos, 2006. 392 s.
Inozemtsev V. L. Raskolotaya tsivilizatsiya. M.: Academia; Nauka, 1999. 724 s.
Klyuchevskii V. O. Russkaya istoriya. Polnyi kurs lektsii. M.: OLMA-PRESS Obrazovanie, 2004. 831 s.
Kon I. S. Seksual'naya kul'tura v Rossii. Klubnichka na berezke. M.: Airis-press, 2005. 448 s.
Lotman Yu. M. Problema "obucheniya kul'ture" kak tipologicheskaya kharakteristika // Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2001. S. 417-425.
Markuze G. Odnomernyi chelovek. Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial'nogo obshchestva. M.: REFL-book, 1994. 368 s.
Mironov B. N. Sotsial'naya istoriya Rossii perioda Imperii (XVIII - nachalo XX veka): genezis lichnosti, demokraticheskoi sem'i, grazhdanskogo obshchestva i pravovogo gosudarstva: v 2-kh t. SPb.: Dmitrii Bulanin, 2000. T. 1. 548 s.; T. 2. 566 s.
Mukhamedzhanova N. M. Rossiya kak marginal'naya tsivilizatsiya // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2004. № 7. S. 4-8.
Pyzhikov A. V. Grani russkogo raskola. Tainaya rol' staroobryadchestva ot 17 veka do 17 goda. M.: Kontseptual, 2016. 536 s.
Sergeeva O. A. Osobennosti sovremennykh tsivilizatsionnykh protsessov. M.: MATI - RGTU im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2002. 267 s.
Flier A. Ya. Kul'tura kak faktor natsional'noi bezopasnosti [Elektronnyi resurs] // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1998. № 3. S. 181-187. URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/576/426/1218/017Flier.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 14.09.2018).