CLARIFICATION METHOD IN E. HUSSERL’S PHENOMENOLOGY
Terent’eva Tat’yana Aleksandrovna
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Submitted: 09.08.2018
Abstract. The article is devoted to revealing the content of the clarification method (die Methode der Kl?rung) in phenomenological philosophy. The paper focuses on the following issues: What is the essence of the clarification method? What is its purpose? HOW to clarify the essence of phenomena, and WHAT IS the clarity of phenomena? The author points out the presence of problematic issues and that the possibility of implementing this method depends on their solution. Following the clarification of phenomena nature, the author also points to the presence of the other side of the clarification method. This side consists in the essential analysis of the notion. Here we concern the difference between bringing to clarity and clarification. As a result, the aim of the clarification method is found in the coincidence of the verbal meaning and the semantic aspect of the object. However, if we move from static phenomenology to genetic phenomenology, then the clarification method acquires hermeneutic features.
Key words and phrases: статическая феноменология, метод прояснения (die Methode der Kl?rung), приведение к отчетливости (Verdeutlichung), эйдетическая наука, сущностный анализ, герменевтика, изначальная данность, аналитический смысл, генетическая феноменология, горизонт неопределимого, static phenomenology, method of clarification (die Methode der Kl?rung), bringing to clarity (Verdeutlichung), eidetic science, essential analysis, hermeneutics, primordial entity, analytical sense, genetic phenomenology, prospects of the indefinable
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Gaidenko P. P. Istoriya novoevropeiskoi filosofii v ee svyazi s naukoi. SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 456 s.
Gusserl' E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii: v 3-kh kn. Izd-e 2-e. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2009. Kn. 1 / per. s nem. A. V. Mikhailova; vstup. st. V. A. Kurennogo. 496 s.
Gusserl' E. Metod proyasneniya / per. A. A. Pechenkina // Sovremennaya filosofiya nauki: znanie, ratsional'nost', tsennosti v trudakh myslitelei Zapada: khrestomatiya. M.: Logos, 1994. S. 234-242.
Chernavin G. Transzendentale Arch?ologie. Ontologie. Metaphysik. Libri Virides 7. Nordhausen: T. Bautz, 2011. 128 S.
Husserl E. Ideen zu einer reinen Ph?nomenologie und ph?nomenologischen Philosophie. Drittes Buch: Die Ph?nomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaft. Husserliana IV / hrsg. von M. Biemel. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1952. 165 S.
Husserl E. Zur Lehre vom Wesen und zur Methode der eidetischen Variation. Husserliana XLI / hrsg. von U. Melle. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. 499 S.
Husserl E. Zur ph?nomenologischen Reduktion. Husserliana XXXIV. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002. 660 S.
Kern I. Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung ?ber Husserls Verh?ltnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus. Phaenomenologica 16. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964. 448 S.
Lotz C. Das Ereignis des Unverst?ndlichen // Ereignis auf Franz?sisch: von Bergson bis Deleuze / hrsg. Marc R?lli. M?nchen: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2004. S. 63-77.
Zahavi D. Husserl und die transzendentale Intersubjektivit?t. Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik. Phaenomenologica 135. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. 212 S.
Русский
