Modern LMS Platforms for Distance Education: Analysis and Comparison
Isaeva Elizaveta Sergeevna
Southern Federal University
Submitted: 29.09.2021
Abstract. The study aims to determine the main parameters and tools of learning management systems (LMS), identify their strengths and weaknesses using the example of several distance education platforms (Moodle, Google Classroom, Microsoft Teams, Open edX and ILIAS), which are widely used not only in Russia but also around the world, in order to bring out the pedagogical potential for online learning at higher education institutions. The paper lists the main elements of information technology support for learning, draws conclusions about the most effective LMS platforms. Scientific novelty lies in identifying the main characteristics of the platforms that are necessary for the successful implementation of online education in current conditions. As a result of the study, the researcher has determined the main parameters and tools of LMS.
Key words and phrases: дистанционное обучение, система управления обучением, платформа дистанционного образования, онлайн-обучение, distance education, learning management system, distance education platform, online learning
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bataev A. V. Elektronnoe obuchenie kak uslovie povysheniya kachestva podgotovki inzhenerno-ekonomicheskikh kadrov // Planirovanie i obespechenie podgotovki kadrov dlya promyshlenno-ekonomicheskogo kompleksa regiona. 2017. T. 1.
Glotova M. Yu., Samokhvalova E. A. Individual'nye obrazovatel'nye traektorii na baze sistem distantsionnoi podderzhki obrazovatel'nogo protsessa na primere SDO Moodle // Nauka i shkola. 2015. № 5.
Isaeva E. S. Elektronnoe obuchenie kak sposob organizatsii samostoyatel'noi raboty studentov // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. № 1-2.
Kuznetsov N. V. Onlain-obrazovanie: klyuchevye trendy i prepyatstviya // E-Management. 2019. № 1.
Mironova Yu. N. Ispol'zovanie distantsionnykh tekhnologii pri provedenii zanyatii: LMS MOODLE, GOOGLE KLASS, MICROSOFT TEAMS // Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya. 2020. T. 9. № 4 (33).
Petrova V. I. Organizatsiya i planirovanie samostoyatel'noi raboty studentov pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v kontekste smeshannogo obucheniya // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2019. № 65-3.
Rabinovich P. D., Zavedenskii K. E., Kushnir M. E. i dr. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya obrazovaniya: ot izmeneniya sredstv k razvitiyu deyatel'nosti // Informatika i obrazovanie. 2020. № 5 (314).
Slastenin V. A., Isaev I. F., Shiyanova E. N. Pedagogika: ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenii / pod red. V. A. Slastenina. M.: Akademiya, 2002.
Tikhomirov V. P. Mir na puti Smart education. Novye vozmozhnosti dlya razvitiya // Otkrytoe obrazovanie. 2011. № 3.
Allen T. D., Golden T. D., Shockley K. M. How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2015. Vol. 16. Issue 2.
Firebaugh G. Seven rules for social research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008
Hoeven C., Zoonen W. Flexible Work Designs and Employee Well-being: Examining the Effects of Resources and Demands // New Technology, Work and Employment. 2015. Vol. 30. Issue 3.
Selim H. M. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models // Computers & Education. 2007. Vol. 49. Issue 2.
Sufian A. J. Methods and Techniques of Social Research // International journal of business. 2015. № 2.
Русский
