Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 4. P. 111-114.
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPTION OF GENIUS: GENDER ASPECT
Shalaeva Marina Vladislavovna
Industrial University of Tyumen (Branch) in Nizhnevartovsk
Submitted: 06.04.2018
Abstract. The article is devoted to the philosophical problems of women’s creativity, which in the modern world acquire the status of a promising research area. Their relevance is conditioned by the historically adopted woman’s cultural anonymity. Participating equally in the historical and cultural process, often contributing immediately to the change of cultural paradigms, the woman has appeared deprived of the genius status. In this connection the author aims to trace the evolution of views on the phenomenon of genius and geniality, paying special attention to evaluating the place and importance of the woman in cultural development. Thus, the paper is intended to compensate for the existing gap in the studies on this issue. The originality of the study involves justification of ontological specificity of the woman’s true geniality: the woman’s subjectivity based on corporal experience comes out as a potential foundation for an alternative way of culture development.
Key words and phrases: философия творчества, субъект творчества, гений, гениальность, гендерные исследования, творчество женщин, женская гениальность, женская субъективность, philosophy of creativity, subject of creativity, genius, geniality, gender studies, women’s creativity, women’s geniality, women’s subjectivity
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Anikst A. Eduard Yung i ego znachenie v istorii shekspirovskoi kritiki // Shekspirovskie chteniya / pod red. A. A. Aniksta. M.: Nauka, 1976. S. 140-149.
Bovuar S. de. Vtoroi pol. SPb.: Azbuka; Azbuka-Attikus, 2017. 924 s.
Burmistrova S. V. Kriticheskaya retseptsiya zhenskoi literatury v perepiske I. Gete i F. Shillera // Vestnik Tomskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2014. № 7 (148). S. 141-145.
Veininger O. Pol i kharakter. M.: Terra, 1992. 480 s.
Gegel' G. V. F. Filosofiya prava. M.: Mysl', 1990. 524 s.
Gete I.-V., Shiller F. Perepiska: v 2-kh t. / perev. s nem. i komm. I. E. Babanova. M.: Iskusstvo, 1988. T. 2. 587 c.
D’Izraeli I. Literaturnyi kharakter, ili Istoriya Geniya. Dubna: Mezhdunarodnyi universitet prirody, obshchestva i cheloveka "Dubna", 2000. 368 s.
Zelinskii F. F. Soperniki khristianstva. M.: Shkola-Press, 1996. 416 s.
Zimmel' G. Izbrannoe: v 2-kh t. M.: Yurist, 1996. T. 2. 607 s.
Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. 367 s.
Kant I. O razlichii vozvyshennogo i prekrasnogo u muzhchin i zhenshchin // Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6-ti t. M.: Mysl', 1964. T. 2. S. 151-167.
Kiryushkina V. V. Genii i bezumie v khudozhestvennom soznanii romantizma // Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura. 2016. № 2. S. 104-107.
Losev A. F. Mifologiya grekov i rimlyan. M.: Mysl', 1996. 975 s.
Safonkina O. S. Zhenskaya sub"ektivnost' v problemnom pole feminizma: tekstual'nye praktiki: avtoref. disc. … k. filos. n. Saransk, 2008. 20 s.
Uarte Kh. Issledovanie sposobnostei k naukam. M.: AN SSSR, 1960. 316 s.
Uord L. Psikhicheskie faktory tsivilizatsii. SPb.: Piter, 2001. 352 s.
Fukalov A. V. Fenomen genial'nosti i postmodernizm // Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 2. S. 18-21.
Shalaeva M. V. Dialektika original'nosti i banal'nosti v kontseptsii geniya M. Nordau // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Filosofiya". 2016. № 3. S. 195-200.
Shopengauer A. Ob interesnom. M.: Olimp, 1997. 432 s.
DeNora T. Music as agency in Beethoven’s Vienna // Myth, meaning, and performance: toward a new cultural sociology of the arts / ed. by R. Eyerman, L. Mccormick. Boulder: Raradigm Rublishers, 2006. P. 103-121.
Nochlin L. Why Are There No Great Women Artists? // Studies in Power and Powerlessness / ed. by V. Gornick, B. Moran. N. Y., 1971. P. 480-510.
Русский
