GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 4. P. 75-79.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2018-4.16

INTERNETIZATION OF CULTURE: ON THE WAY TO THE SOCIETY OF MUTUAL TRANSPARENCY
Lysak Irina Vital'evna
Southern Federal University
Submitted: 10.04.2018
Abstract. The article shows that culture development according to the network principle caused the transformation of the notion "privacy" itself and the formation of the society of mutual transparency where people keep an eye on each other. The process of culture internetization stimulated the powerful movement of both supporters and opponents of transparency, who try to escape from total control and to preserve the right to privacy. The paper traces the evolution of transparency caused by internetization of modern culture. Initially transparency comes out as the state supervision over the society and later on it took the form of citizens’ mutual control over each other. The author identifies such consequences of culture internetization as the minimization of mediatory structures and the transformation of institution of trust conditioned by the development of blockchain technology.
Key words and phrases: сеть, сетевизация культуры, прозрачность, паноптикум, синоптикум, надзор, приватность, блокчейн, доверие, network, internetization of culture, transparency, panopticon, synopticon, supervision, privacy, blockchain, trust
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Gurinskaya A. L. Nadzor kak sredstvo obespecheniya bezopasnosti: ot prostranstva tyur'my do kiberprostranstva // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra: zhurnal Sankt-Peterburgskogo mezhdunarodnogo kriminologicheskogo kluba. 2014. № 2 (33). S. 86-93.
  2. Korchagin S. A. O tekushchikh trendakh v razvitii tekhnologii blokchein // Svobodnaya Mysl'. 2016. № 4. S. 31-38.
  3. Kuzin A. V. Komp'yuternye seti. M.: Forum; INFRA-M, 2011. 192 s.
  4. Mel'nikov D. A. Organizatsiya i obespechenie bezopasnosti informatsionno-tekhnologicheskikh setei i sistem. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2012. 598 s.
  5. Orlova L. N. Informatsionnaya prozrachnost' kak paradigma ustoichivogo razvitiya ekonomicheskikh sistem // MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie). 2015. T. 6. № 4. Ch. 2. S. 368-374.
  6. Pryanikov M. M., Chugunov A. V. Blokchein kak kommunikatsionnaya osnova formirovaniya tsifrovoi ekonomiki: preimushchestva i problemy // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2017. Vol. 5. № 6. R. 49-55.
  7. Fuko M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat': rozhdenie tyur'my. M.: Ad Marginem, 1999. 480 s.
  8. Khan B.-Ch. Prozrachnoe obshchestvo. M.: Logos, 2014. 60 s.
  9. Chernyshov A. G. Tsifrovizatsiya i tekhnologizatsiya obshchestvennoi zhizni kak sotsial'no-politicheskaya problema: sokhranenie identichnosti i rol' gosudarstva v usloviyakh razvitiya global'nykh setei // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2017. № 40. S. 319-328.
  10. Barnes J. Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish // Human Relations. 1954. № 7. P. 39-58.
  11. Bentham J. Panopticon or the Inspection House // The Panopticon Writings / ed. by M. Bozovic. L.: Verso, 1995. R. 29-95.
  12. Bott E. Urban families: Conjugal roles and social networks // Human Relations. 1955. № 8. P. 345-383.
  13. Brin D. The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom. N. Y.: Perseus Books, 1998. 378 p.
  14. Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties // American Journal of Sociology. 1973. Vol. 78. № 6. R. 1360-1380.
  15. Jurgenson N. Review of Ondi Timoner’s We Live in Public // Surveillance & Society. 2010. № 8. R. 374-378.
  16. Lassen D. Political Accountability and the Size of Government: Theory and Cross-Country Evidence [Elektronnyi resurs] / Economic Policy Research Unit and University of Copenhagen. URL: http://www.econ.ku.dk/epru/files/wp/00-20.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 25.04.2018).
  17. Mathiesen T. The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s "Panopticon" revisited // Theoretical Criminology. 1997. № 1/2. P. 304-325.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru