Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 6. Part 1. P. 118-122.
FROM LOGICAL POSITIVISM TO POST-POSITIVISM: THE TURN FROM LOGIC OF SCIENCE TO ITS HISTORY
Pisarchik Leonid Yur'evich
Orenburg State University
Abstract. The article examines the basic ideas of the cumulative conception of science development suggested by logical positivism. The paper discovers ideological foundations of this conception, which trace their origin to G. Galilei’s, F. Bacon’s and D. Hume’s philosophy. Immanuel Kant tried to overcome such tendency of science interpretation and showed relation between philosophy and science and importance of theoretical foundations in scientific cognition. Logical positivism took an empiric, not Kantian, approach to science analysis that predetermined its mistakes in interpreting science history. These misinterpretations were identified and overcome in works by K. Popper, I. Lakatos, T. Kuhn, et al.
Key words and phrases: эмпиризм, логический позитивизм, кумулятивизм, постпозитивизм, пробабилизм, история науки, empiricism, logical positivism, cumulativism, post-positivism, probabilism, history of science
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Akhundov M. D., Illarionov S. V. Metodologiya nauchnykh revolyutsii i razvitie fiziki // Priroda nauchnogo otkrytiya (filosofsko-metodologicheskii analiz). M.: Nauka, 1986. S. 279-295.
Akhundov M. D., Illarionov S. V. Preemstvennost' issledovatel'skikh programm v razvitii fiziki // Voprosy filosofii. 1986. № 6. S. 56-65.
Bekon F. Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1972. T. 2. 582 s.
Vitgenshtein L. Filosofskie raboty: v 2-kh ch. / per. s nem. M. S. Kozlovoi i Yu. A. Aseeva; vstup. st. M. S. Kozlovoi. M.: Gnozis, 1994. Ch. 1. 612 s.
Gaidenko P. P. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya nauki XVII-XVIII vv. Formirovanie nauchnykh programm Novogo vremeni. M.: Nauka, 1987. 447 s.
Illarionov S. V. Teoriya poznaniya i filosofiya nauki. M.: ROSSPEN, 2007. 535 s.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. M.: Mysl', 1994. 591 s.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii. M.: AST, 2001. 608 s.
Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. M.: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1980. T. 18. 525 s.
Nikiforov A. L. Ot formal'noi logiki k istorii nauki. M.: Nauka, 1983. 177 s.
Ot logicheskogo pozitivizma k postpozitivizmu: khrestomatiya. M.: NIIVO INION RAN, 1993. 216 s.
Rassel B. Izbrannye trudy. Novosibirsk: Sibirskoe universitetskoe izdatel'stvo, 2007. 260 s.
Sotsial'nye i metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoi nauki / pod red. V. I. Stepanova. M.: Mysl', 1987. 317 s.
Chernyak V. S. Istoriya. Logika. Nauka. M.: Nauka, 1986. 372 s.
Chudinov E. M. Priroda nauchnoi istiny. M.: Politizdat, 1977. 312 s.
Shvyrev V. S. Teoreticheskoe i empiricheskoe v nauchnom poznanii. M.: Nauka, 1978. 382 s.
Shlik M. Povorot v filosofii // Analiticheskaya filosofiya: izbrannye teksty. M.: Izdatel'stvo MGU, 1993. S. 28-33.
Yum D. Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. Izd-e 2-e. M.: Mysl', 1996. T. 2. 799 s.
Reichenbach H. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy [Elektronnyi resurs]. Berkeley - Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1968. 333 p. URL: https://ru.scribd.com/document/314477000/Reichenbach-Hans-The-Rise-of-Scientific-Philosophy (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2017).
Русский
