GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 5. P. 129-131.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

THE TWIN PARADOX AS A LOGIC ERROR

Otyutskii Gennadii Pavlovich
Russian State Social University in Moscow


Abstract. The article deals with the existing approaches to the consideration of the twin paradox. It is shown that although the formulation of this paradox is related to the special theory of relativity, the general theory of relativity is also used in most attempts to explain it, which is not methodologically correct. The author grounds a proposition that the formulation of the "twin paradox" itself is initially incorrect, because it describes the event that is impossible within the framework of the special theory of relativity.
Key words and phrases: парадокс близнецов, общая теория относительности, специальная теория относительности, пространство, время, одновременность, А. Эйнштейн, twin paradox, general theory of relativity, special theory of relativity, space, time, simultaneity, A. Einstein
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Borisov Yu. A. Obzor kritiki teorii otnositel'nosti // Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii. 2016. № 3. S. 382-392.
  2. Born M. Kosmicheskie puteshestviya i paradoks chasov // Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk. 1959. T. LXIX. S. 105-110.
  3. Vereshchagin I. A. Lzheucheniya i paranauka KhKh veka. Chast' 2 // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2007. № 7. S. 28-34.
  4. Kamenev A. S. Teoriya otnositel'nosti A. Einshteina i nekotorye filosofskie problemy vremeni // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya "Filosofskie nauki". 2015. № 2 (14). S. 42-59.
  5. Paradoks bliznetsov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoks_bliznetsov (data obrashcheniya: 31.03.2017).
  6. Pivovarov V. G., Nikonov O. A. Zamechaniya k paradoksu bliznetsov // Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2000. T. 3. № 1. S. 137-144.
  7. Skobel'tsyn D. V. Paradoks bliznetsov i teoriya otnositel'nosti. M.: Nauka, 1966. 192 s.
  8. Terletskii Ya. P. Paradoksy teorii otnositel'nosti. M.: Nauka, 1966. 120 s.
  9. Tomson Dzh. P. Predvidimoe budushchee. M.: Inostrannaya literatura, 1958. 176 s.
  10. Einshtein A. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov. M.: Nauka, 1965. T. 1. Raboty po teorii otnositel'nosti 1905-1920. 700 s.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru