Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 5. P. 104-106.
METHODOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES OF THINKING RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Men'shikova Anna Andreevna
National Research Tomsk State University
Abstract. The article is devoted to the issue of relationship of philosophy and science (cognitive science), boundaries of the thinking category. Thinking is an object of cognitive studies in various manifestations (neurobiological cognitive science, different particular cognitive sciences, cognitive approach) and it does not always coincide with the philosophical idea about it. The cognitive science asserts biological conditionality of thinking. Philosophy has kept the speculative level and approaches in sciences.
Key words and phrases: когнитология, теория познания, философия и наука, когнитивная наука, границы категорий, взаимоотношение, научный объект, мышление, парадигма наук, когнитивный подход, cognitology, theory of cognition, philosophy and science, cognitive science, boundaries of categories, relationship, scientific object, thinking, paradigm of sciences, cognitive approach
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Lakoff Dzh. Zhenshchiny, ogon' i opasnye veshchi: chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii / per. s angl. I. B. Shapunovskogo. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2004. 792 s.
Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala / per. s nem. A. I. Fedorova i dr. M.: Respublika, 1998. 498 s.
Maturana U. R., Varela F. Kh. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya / per. s angl. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 223 s.
Mikeshina L. A. Filosofiya nauki: sovremennaya epistemologiya. Nauchnoe znanie v dinamike kul'tury. Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya: ucheb. posobie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya; MPSI; Flinta, 2005. 464 s.
Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://royallib.com/book/follmer_gerhard/ evolyutsionnaya_teoriya_poznaniya__vrogdyonnie_strukturi_poznaniya_v_kontekste_biologii_psihologii_lingvistiki_filosofii_i_teorii_nauki.html (data obrashcheniya: 24.03.2017).
Chernikova I. V. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya v sovremennoi nauke // Definitsii kul'tury: sbornik trudov uchastnikov vserossiiskogo seminara molodykh uchenykh. Tomsk, 2001. Vyp. 5. S. 18-32.
Chernikova I. V. Epistemologicheskie skhemy ili kognitivnye praktiki kak osnovanie nauchnykh paradigm [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://fsf.tsu.ru/wp_test/wp-content/uploads/publications/chernikova_iv/epistemolog_shemy.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2016).
Yanchenko A. A. Metodologicheskii potentsial epistemologicheskogo konstruktivizma dlya razrabotki teorii iskusstvennogo intellekta // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 1 (39). Ch. 2. C. 210-215.
Русский
