Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 3. Part 1. P. 48-50.
OVERCOMING "THEORY OF SLAVES’ REVOLUTION" IN THE SOVIET HISTORICAL SCIENCE: CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS AND "POINTS OF NO RETURN"
Voloshin Dmitrii Alekseevich
Armavir State Pedagogical University
Abstract. The article summarizes research experience of identifying exact and approximate dates in history of the Soviet historical science when there appeared a tendency to re-interpret Stalin’s conception of the revolutionizing role of Barbarian invasions and slave rebellions in the late antiquity. The paper systematizes variants of chronological approaches to the problem, identifies the key marginal dates and the most emblematic works, after which abandoning postulates of Stalin’s conception can be considered ultimate and irreversible.
Key words and phrases: сталинизм в исторической науке, Римская империя, рабы, варвары, "теория революции рабов", историография, историческая концепция, Stalinism in historical science, The Roman Empire, slaves, barbarians, "theory of slaves’ revolution", historiography, historical conception
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Za glubokoe ovladenie teoreticheskim naslediem Lenina (ot redaktsii) // Vestnik drevnei istorii. 1957. № 1. S. 3-16.
Kazarov S. S. A. D. Dmitrev, V. T. Sirotenko i tezis o revolyutsii rabov v otechestvennoi istoriografii // II Sirotenkovskie chteniya: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Armavir: RITs AGPA, 2011. S. 6-9.
Kozlov V. P. Razgovor dvukh istorikov (E. N. Kusheva - B. A. Romanov. Perepiska 1940-1957 gg.) // Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. 2011. № 1. S. 121-125.
Krikh S. B. Obraz drevnosti v sovetskoi istoriografii. M.: KRASAND, 2013. 320 s.
Krikh S. B., Metel' O. V. Sovetskaya istoriografiya drevnosti v kontekste mirovoi istoriograficheskoi mysli. M.: LENAND, 2014. 256 s.
Neronova V. D. Issledovanie roli varvarov v padenii Zapadnoi Rimskoi imperii v sovetskoi istoriografii // Programma zasedanii i tezisy dokladov po problemam antichnosti. M., 1968. S. 39-41.
Neronova V. D. Formy ekspluatatsii v drevnem mire v zerkale sovetskoi istoriografii. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo un-ta, 1992. 312 s.
Ryazanov V. V. Istoriografiya ob uchastii rabov v dvizhenii Seksta Pompeya v 43-36 gg. do n.e. // Novik: sbornik nauchnykh rabot aspirantov i studentov Istoricheskogo fakul'teta Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta / nauch. red. A. I. Filyushkin. Voronezh: VGU, 2001. Vyp. 4. S. 21-34.
Sergeev V. S. Ocherki po istorii Drevnego Rima: uchebnoe posobie dlya istoricheskikh fakul'tetov. M.: Sotsekgiz, 1938. Ch. 2. 829 s.
Struve V. V., Pigulevskaya N. V. Problema krizisa rabovladel'cheskogo stroya i genezisa feodalizma // Voprosy istorii. 1956. № 9. S. 191-195.
Utchenko S. L. Drevnii Rim. Sobytiya. Lyudi. Idei. M.: Nauka, 1969. 324 s.
Khainen Kh. Rastsvet i upadok sovetskikh issledovanii o rabstve: ocherk o vzaimosvyazi politiki i nauki // Vestnik drevnei istorii. 2014. № 4. S. 143-178.
Chernyshov Yu. G. "Kto byl nichem, tot stanet vsem" (k voprosu ob ideologii vosstanii rabov vo II-I vv. do n.e.) // Antichnyi polis: problemy sotsial'no-politicheskoi organizatsii i ideologii antichnogo obshchestva: mezhvuzovskii sbornik. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 1995. S. 155-166.