Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 9. P. 78-84.
P. FEYERABEND’S METHODOLOGICAL PURPOSES AS A MANIFESTATION OF MENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POST-NEOCLASSICAL SCIENCE
Kolesova Ol'ga Valentinovna
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Abstract. The article examines P. Feyerabend’s methodological purposes taking into account the mental characteristics of post-neoclassical science. The scientific community ambiguously evaluates P. Feyerabend’s contribution into the philosophy of science. The author analyzes philosopher’s methodological approach considering the conceptual, normative and value components. In Feyerabend’s epistemological anarchism the paper identifies liberalism conceptions, ontological foundations, humanistic values. The study is conducted within the framework of post-modernist discourse which was anticipated and largely developed by Feyerabend.
Key words and phrases: экстерналистская составляющая, эпистемологический анархизм, контрпродуктивные действия, контрправило, пролиферация, принцип несоизмеримости, рациональность, формы бытия, ментальность, постнеклассическая наука, externalistic element, epistemological anarchism, counter-productive actions, counter-principle, proliferation, incommensurability principle, rationality, forms of existence, mentality, post-neoclassical science
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Gritsanov A. A. Noveishii filosofskii slovar'. Izd-e 2-e, pererab. i dop. Mn.: Interpresservis; Knizhnyi Dom, 2001. 1280 s.
Kolesova O. V. Gnoseologicheskii smysl ponyatiya "mental'nost'" // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. № 6 (1). S. 367-373.
Kolesova O. V. Metod I. Lakatosa kak vyrazhenie mental'nykh kharakteristik postneklassicheskoi nauki // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 8 (58): v 3-kh ch. Ch. 2. S. 103-107.
Kuznetsova N. I. Neopoznannyi Feierabend // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2001. № 1. T. 3. S. 210-216.
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii. M.: AST, 2002. 608 c.
Lotman Yu. M. Russkaya kul'tura poslepetrovskoi epokhi i khristianskaya traditsiya [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://palomnic.org/bibl_lit/bibl/lotman/ (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2016).
Mikeshina L. A. Filosofiya poznaniya. Polemicheskie glavy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2002. 624 s.
Narskii I. S. Pol Feierabend i krizis "postpozitivistskoi" metodologii // Feierabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki. M.: Progress, 1986. S. 5-28.
Nauka. Filosofiya. Religiya / In-t filosofii RAN; otv. red.: P. P. Gaidenko, V. N. Katasonov. M.: IFRAN, 2007. Kn. 2. 247 s.
Porus V. N. Ot metodologicheskogo plyuralizma k distsiplinarnomu organizmu: sluchai psikhologii // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2015. № 1. S. 5-18.
Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa: novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi. M.: Progress, 1986. 432 s.
Reale D., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dnei: v 4-kh t. SPb.: TOO TK "Petropolis", 1997. T. 4. Ot romantizma do nashikh dnei. 880 s.
Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya: slovar' / sost. i otv. red. V. S. Malakhov, V. P. Filatov. M.: TON - Ostozh'e, 1998. 544 s.
Sokal A., Brikmon Zh. Intellektual'nye ulovki. Kritika sovremennoi filosofii postmoderna / per. s angl. A. Kostikovoi i D. Kralechkina. M.: Dom intellektual'noi knigi, 2002. 248 s.
Stepin V. Osnovaniya nauki i ikh sotsiokul'turnaya razmernost' [Elektronnyi resurs] // Nauchnye i vnenauchnye formy myshleniya. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/nau_anti/01.php (data obrashcheniya: 26.07.2016).
Feierabend P. Protiv metoda: ocherk anarkhistskoi teorii poznaniya / per. s ang. A. L. Nikiforova. M.: AST: KhRANITEL', 2007. 413 s.
Feinman R. Kakoe tebe delo do togo, chto dumayut drugie? M. - Izhevsk: RKhD, 2001. 208 s.
Fuko M. Istoriya seksual'nosti-III: zabota o sebe. Kiev - M.: Dukh i litera; Grunt; Refl-buk, 1998. 288 s.
Khorgan Dzh. Konets nauki / per. s angl. M. Zhukovoi. SPb.: Amfora, 2001. 479 s.
Shchedrovitskii G. P. Modeli novykh faktov dlya logiki // Voprosy filosofii. 1968. № 4. S. 154-158.
Yung K. G. Protivorechiya Freida i Yunga // Problemy dushi nashego vremeni. M.: Progress; Univers, 1994. S. 61-69.
Русский
