Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 5. Part 2. P. 201-204.
FEATURES OF LEGAL ASSESSMENT OF CORRUPTION CRIMES COMMITTED BY PENAL SYSTEM EMPLOYEES
Khripushin Eduard Nikolaevich
Voronezh Institute of Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
Abstract. This article attempts to cover the features of the assessment of corruption crimes committed by penal system employees. The analysis of the main features of individual corruption acts influencing qualification is conducted. The author compares different points of view in the science of criminal law on qualification, studies the data of the statistical reports of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia according to 3-ПР form (about the state of law and crimes among penal system employees), as well as considers the materials of judicial practice. The results show that lucrative impulse is compulsory in corruption crimes.
Key words and phrases: коррупционные преступления, преступления, совершаемые сотрудниками УИС, посредничество во взяточничестве, квалификация преступлений, корыстные преступления, взяточничество, дача взятки, провокация взятки, коррупция, коррупционные уголовные правонарушения, corruption crimes, crimes committed by penal system employees, intermediation in bribery, qualification of crimes, acquisitive crime, bribe-taking, bribery, provocation of bribes, corruption, corruption criminal offenses
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bratanovskii S. N., Zelenov M. F. Ponyatie, sostav i vidy korruptsionnykh pravonarushenii // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2011. № 11. S. 23-31.
Verkhovnyi Sud Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie ot 18 oktyabrya 2011 g. № 80-O11-13 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://dogovor-urist.ru/sudebnaya_praktika/delo/9329/ (data obrashcheniya: 29.03.2015).
Gavrilenkov S. A. Umysel - sotsial'no-psikhologicheskii aspekt // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 12 (50). Ch. 3. S. 52-55.
Galakhova A. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya: monografiya. M.: Rossiiskaya akademiya pravosudiya, 2003. 141 s.
Gertsenzon A. A. Kvalifikatsiya prestuplenii. M.: Izd-vo VYuA KA, 1947. 26 s.
Gureev V. A. K voprosu o preduprezhdenii korruptsionnykh riskov v organakh prinuditel'nogo ispolneniya // Zakony Rossii. 2009. № 12. S. 39-44.
Kostyleva G. V., Milovanova M. M. Dolzhnostnye prestupleniya korruptsionnoi napravlennosti // Sledovatel'. 2012. № 12. S. 31-35.
Kudryavtsev V. N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestuplenii. M.: Yurid. lit., 1999. 301 s.
Kurs ugolovnogo prava: uchebnik: v 5-ti t. / pod red. I. M. Kuznetsovoi, I. M. Tyazhkovoi, G. N. Borzenkova, V. S. Komissarova. M.: Zertsalo, 2002. T. 3. Osobennaya chast'. 470 s.
O sostoyanii distsipliny, zakonnosti i dorozhno-transportnykh proisshestvii sredi sotrudnikov UIS za 2006-2013 gg. // Obzor FSIN Rossii. M., 2014.
O sudebnoi praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve i ob inykh korruptsionnykh prestupleniyakh [Elektronnyi resurs]: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 09 iyulya 2013 g. № 24. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_155458/ (data obrashcheniya: 29.03.2015).
Tikhomirov Yu. A., Trikoz E. N. Pravo protiv korruptsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2007. № 5. S. 39-42.
Русский
