Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 2. Part 2. P. 144-149.
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF RESEARCH OF THE RUSSIAN POLITICAL PARTIES AS POLITICAL ACTORS. PART II
Mart'yanov Denis Sergeevich, Nevzorov Maksim Vadimovich, Pryakhin Aleksei Yur'evich
Saint Petersburg State University
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
Abstract. The article considers the methodological aspects of creating a database for the research of the political activity of political parties in Russia. The problem of identifying stable frames finding expression in events that combine the actions of a party with its discourse is solved. The authors reveal the methodological features of research related to the creation of a database on political events, and make the conceptualization of an "event". A set of project data including the encyclopedia of the Russian parties, the quantitative description of the parties and the event field of the parties is described. Frames in the discourses of new parties are analyzed. The event-analysis of the parties is carried out. The method of political trace-analysis is approved. The basic stable frames of new political parties are identified.
Key words and phrases: актор, методология, дискурс, дискурс-анализ, событие, фрейм, база данных, трейс-анализ, партийная система, политические партии, actor, methodology, discourse, discourse analysis, event, frame, database, trace-analysis, party system, political parties
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Gofman I. Analiz freimov. Esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta. M.: In-t sotsiologii RAN, 2004. 752 s.
Mart'yanov D. S., Nevzorov M. V. Metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya rossiiskikh politicheskikh partii kak politicheskikh aktorov. Chast' I // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 12 (50). Ch. 3. S. 144-148.
Ostin A. Rannee preduprezhdenie i monitoring konfliktov // Etnopoliticheskii konflikt: puti transformatsii. Nastol'naya kniga Bergkhofskogo tsentra. M.: Nauka, 2007. S. 132-155.
Smorgunov L. V. Sobytiinoe politicheskoe znanie i ego znachenie dlya sovremennoi sravnitel'noi politologii // Polis. 2011. № 1. S. 122-133.
Fillips L., Iorgensen M. V. Diskurs-analiz: teoriya i praktika. Khar'kov: Gumanitarnyi Tsentr, 2008. 352 s.
Azar E. E. The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project // Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1980. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 143-152.
Benford R. D., Snow D. A. Framing Processes and Social Movements: an Overview and Assessment // Annual Review of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 26. P. 611-639.
Budge I., Laver M. Policy, Ideology, and Party Distance: Analysis of Election Programmes in 19 Democracies // Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1986. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 607-617.
Koenig T. Compounding Mixed-Methods Problems in Frame Analysis through Comparative Research // Qualitative Research. 2006. Vol. 6 (1). P. 61-76.
Koopmans R., Statham P. Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches // Mobilization: the International Journal of Research and Theory about Social Movements, Protest and Collective Behavior. 1999. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 203-221.
Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed. L. - N. Y.: Verso, 2001. 240 p.
Русский
