Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 12. Part 3. P. 43-46.
MODERN TRENDS OF DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CONTEST OFFICIALS’ ACTIONS AND DECISIONS
Gizyatova Svetlana Vladimirovna
Naberezhnye Chelny Institute (Branch) of Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Abstract. The article deals with the essence of subjective constitutional right to contest the actions and decisions of regional officials with the purpose of their theorization and the identification of modern trends. The author studies the problem of its perception in the constitutional legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. On the basis of some theoretical approaches the researcher reveals a defect in the form of the right asymmetry, which lies in the unjustified narrowing of the subject of the regulation of one general law against the background of the provisions of the special legal act.
Key words and phrases: право на оспаривание, институт оспаривания, права человека, Конституция, конституционное право субъектов федерации, right to contest, institution of contest, human rights, constitution, constitutional law of constituent entities of federation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Atakhanova S. K. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya sushchnost' instituta obrashchenii grazhdan v organy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Molodoi uchenyi. 2012. № 4. S. 265-269.
Afanas'ev S. F., Borisov M. S. K voprosu o svyazi obyazatel'nosti i preyuditsial'nosti sudebnogo resheniya, vstupivshego v zakonnuyu silu // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2014. № 7. S. 15-20.
Garipov R. F. Deliktosposobnost' publichno-pravovykh obrazovanii // Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2009. № 9. S. 159-163.
Zaznaev O. I., Garipov R. F. Konstitutsionno-pravovye problemy identifikatsii otdel'nykh organov i dolzhnostnykh lits s vetvyami gosudarstvennoi vlasti Respubliki Tatarstan // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. 2012. № 4. S. 156-159.
Il'in A. V. K voprosu o soderzhanii preyuditsial'nosti - svoistva zakonnoi sily sudebnogo resheniya // Zakon. 2015. № 3. S. 75-93.
Krylatova I. Yu. Mekhanizm realizatsii i zashchity prav cheloveka v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: ponyatie, sushchnost', struktura, formy // Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2014. № 3. S. 210-223.
Loshkarev A. V. Institut obrashchenii grazhdan kak vid spetsial'no-yuridicheskikh garantii // Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya i torgovaya politika. 2008. № 1. S. 198-201.
Luk'yanchikova L. V. Institut narodnykh obrashchenii v Rossii: istoriko-pravovoi aspekt // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. № 3. S. 73-84.
Nazarov D. G. Dosudebnyi poryadok pri osparivanii podozritel'nykh sdelok dolzhnika v dele o bankrotstve // Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 2 (4). S. 70-72.
Savos'kin A. V. O neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya instituta dosudebnykh obrashchenii grazhdan v svete pravovykh pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. № 2. S. 50-53.
Timoshenko K. I. Vnesudebnye sposoby zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka v Rossii: sravnitel'no-pravovoi analiz // Filosofiya prava. 2014. № 3 (64). S. 123-126.
Русский
