Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 2. Part 1. P. 171-175.
HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN CONTEXT OF WEST GEOPOLITICS
Sirota Naum Mikhailovich, Khomeleva Ramona Aleksandrovna
Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation
Abstract. The article reveals the place and role of humanitarian intervention and its modifications of "responsibility to protect" in the geopolitics of the West. The argumentation of the supporters and opponents of humanitarian intervention is analyzed. The authors’ point of view on ways to resolve the conflict between the basic principles of international law – ensuring the sovereignty of states and the protection of human rights – is given.
Key words and phrases: гуманитарная катастрофа, гуманитарная интервенция, суверенитет, права человека, геноцид, вооружённый конфликт, humanitarian disaster, humanitarian intervention, sovereignty, human rights, genocide, armed conflict
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Kotlyar V. S. Kontseptsiya "otvetstvennosti za zashchitu" kak proekt kodeksa provedeniya gumanitarnykh interventsii // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2005. № 3 (24). S. 44-48; № 4 (25). S. 53-55.
Labyuk O. E. "Otvetstvennost' po zashchite" i pravo na vmeshatel'stvo // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2008. № 3. S. 59-66.
Maleev Yu. N. Kontseptual'noe obosnovanie preventivnoi gumanitarnoi interventsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. 2009. № 2. S. 6-33.
Rezolyutsiya 1973 (2011), prinyataya Sovetom Bezopasnosti na ego 6498-m zasedanii 17 marta 2011 goda 12 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.docme.ru/doc/16921/rezolyuciya-oon-1973 (data obrashcheniya: 12.01.2014).
Sazonova K. L. Kontseptsiya "otvetstvennost' za zashchitu" v mirotvorcheskoi deyatel'nosti Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2012. № 1. S. 96-100.
Sirota N. M. Global'nyi miroporyadok: aktory i trendy stanovleniya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 4 (30). Ch. 1. S. 157-164.
Bettati M., Kouchner D. Le devoir d'intelligence: peut-on les laisser mourir? Paris: Denoel publishers, 1987. 320 p.
Evans G. The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes. Once and For All. Publisher: Brookings Institution Press, 2008. 349 p.
Glennon M. The New Interventionism: the Search for a Just International Law // Foreign Affairs. 1999. Vol. 78. № 3. P. 3-7.
National Security Strategy – the White House [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/ files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 06.09.2013).
Nye J. Bound to Lead: the Changing Nature of American Power. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2003. 336 p.
Nye J. Redefining the National Interest // Foreign Affairs. 1999. Vol. 78. № 4. P. 23-32.
Rice S. E., Loomis A. J. The Evolution of Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect // Beyond Preemption: Force and Legitimacy in a Changing World / ed. by Ivo H. Daalder. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2007. 179 p.
The Responsibility to Protect [Elektronnyi resurs]: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. URL: http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-9436-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.09.2013).
Русский
