Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 5. Part 1. P. 16-18.
EVIDENCE COLLECTION BY DEFENCE ATTORNEY WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF ADVERSARY CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Ataev Kamal Asel'dergadzhievich
Ministry of Labour and Social Development of the Republic of Dagestan
Abstract. The author reveals the problem of collecting evidence by the defence attorney within the framework of adversary criminal procedure, researches the action range of the principle of adversary nature and parts equality in the Russian criminal procedure, analyzes the Criminal Procedure Code of the RF as to the regulation of collecting evidence process by the defence attorney within criminal cases, concludes that the legislator, establishing the defence attorney’s rights, did not consolidate the legal mechanism of their realization, and suggests the ideas for the improvement of advocacy quality.
Key words and phrases: адвокат, защитник, принцип состязательности, уголовно-процессуальное доказывание, собирание доказательств, предварительное расследование, attorney, defence attorney, adversary principle, criminal procedural proving, evidence collection, preliminary invest
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bozh'ev V. Sostyazatel'nost' na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Zakonnost'. 2004. № 1. S. 5-7.
Derishev Yu. V. Kontseptsiya ugolovnogo dosudebnogo proizvodstva v pravovoi doktrine sovremennoi Rossii: monografiya. Omsk, 2004. 291 s.
Dolya E. A. O sobiranii i formirovanii dokazatel'stv po UPK RF // Novyi Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossii v deistvii: materialy kruglogo stola (13 noyabrya 2003 g.). M., 2004.
Lazareva V. Sostyazatel'nost' i dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 3. S. 6-8.
Maslova D. A. Uchastie advokata-zashchitnika v dokazyvanii na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] // Advokatskaya praktika. 2008. № 3. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoi sistemy "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chastei tret'ei, chetvertoi i pyatoi stat'i 377 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa RSFSR [Elektronnyi resurs]: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF № 2-P ot 14 fevralya 2000 g. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoi sistemy "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Pobedkin A. V. Nekotorye voprosy sobiraniya dokazatel'stv po novomu ugolovno-protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. № 1. S. 57-64.
Pogodin S. Deistvuet li printsip sostyazatel'nosti na dosudebnykh stadiyakh // Zakonnost'. 2005. № 3. S. 44-47.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Elektronnyi resurs]: Federal'nyi zakon ot 18 dekabrya 2001 g. № 174-FZ. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoi sistemy "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Khimicheva G. P. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam: kontseptsiya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-protsessual'noi deyatel'nosti: avtoref. diss.. d.yu.n. M., 2003. 25 s.
Chichkanov A. B. Printsip sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 2001. № 4. S. 120-131.
Русский
