Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 2. Part 1. P. 126-128.
Mavrin Anton Anatol'evich
Cherepovets State University
Abstract. The author shows the role, which technics plays in a modern man’s life, pays special attention to the features of the mutual influence of ontologized technogenic environment and man, traces the enslavement of the latter by technics, reveals the basic reasons of the substitution of a man’s life goal by means of its ensuring – technics, and seeks to expose the essence of technics and the possibilities of liberating man from technical dependence.
Key words and phrases: техника, человек, техногенная среда, онтологизация техники, технизация, антропосферный подход, technics, man, technogenic environment, ontologization of technics, technicalization, anthroposphere approach
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Berdyaev N. A. Chelovek i mashina: problema sotsiologii i metafiziki tekhniki // Put'. 1933. № 38. S. 3-38.
Gvishiani D. M. Krizis burzhuaznykh kontseptsii nauchno-tekhnicheskoi revolyutsii // Tekhnika, obshchestvo, chelovek. M., 1981. S. 24-43.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Razmyshleniya o tekhnike // Voprosy filosofii. 1993. № 10. S. 32-68.
Tasalov V. I. Estetika tekhnitsizma. M.: Iskusstvo, 1960. 152 s.
Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: stat'i i vystupleniya / sost., per. s nem. i komm. V. V. Bibikhina. M.: Respublika, 1993. 447 s.
Yaspers K. Sovremennaya tekhnika // Novaya tekhnokraticheskaya volna na Zapade. M., 1986. S. 119-146.