GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2012. № 3. Part 2. P. 67-71.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Law Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

JUDICIAL DISCRETION LIMITS OPTIMIZATION AS JUSTICE EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT FACTOR

Ivanova Mariya Vasil'evna
Russian State Social University (Branch) in Murmansk


Abstract. The author considers two directions of judicial discretion limits optimization: legislative base perfection and judiciary representatives' moral and legal culture rise, substantiates the conclusion about the necessity to formalize the limits of a court discretion activity and suggests the complex solution of the problem of judicial discretion limits restriction by the example of suits about moral harm indemnification caused as the result of criminal activity.
Key words and phrases: судебное усмотрение, правосудие, ограничение судебной дискреции, конкретизация права, усмотрение судьи при определении суммы компенсации морального вреда, правовая культура судей, judicial discretion, justice, judicial discretion restriction, law specification, judge's discretion in determining compensation amount for moral harm, judges' legal culture
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Abrosimova E. B. Sud v sisteme razdeleniya vlastei: rossiiskaya model': konstitutsionno-teoreticheskie aspekty. M.: Statut, 2002. 422 s.
  2. Bannikov G. N. Psikhodiagnostika kandidatov i psikhologicheskoe obespechenie deyatel'nosti sudei [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.vkks.ru/second.php?columnValue=5 (data obrashcheniya: 02.04.2011).
  3. Barak A. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie / per. s angl. M.: NORMA, 1999. 376 s.
  4. Berg L. N. Sudebnoe usmotrenie i ego predely: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2008. 202 s.
  5. Berezin A. A. Predely pravoprimenitel'nogo usmotreniya: diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2007. 200 s.
  6. Igumen Petr (Eremeev). Fundamental'nye nravstvennye osnovy pravoprimeneniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://dpr.ru/pravo/pravo_20_21.htm (data obrashcheniya: 15.05.2011).
  7. Kleandrov M. O sovershenstvovanii mekhanizma otbora kadrov v sud'i i nadelenii ikh sudeiskimi polnomochiyami // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2005. № 5. S. 86-92.
  8. Martyshkin V. N. Pravovye i nravstvennye kriterii sudebnogo usmotreniya // Pravo i bezopasnost'. 2009. № 3.
  9. Nedel'ko I. "Kommersant" v sudeiskoi mantii [Elektronnyi resurs] // Narodnaya gazeta Sochi. 2010. 16 oktyabrya. URL: http://www.ngsochi.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=327:-qq-&catid=6:2010-09-28-13-00-56&Itemid=10 (data obrashcheniya: 16.02.2011).
  10. Rarog A. I., Gracheva Yu. V. Zakonodatel'naya tekhnika kak sredstvo ogranicheniya sudeiskogo usmotreniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 11. S. 93-100.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru