GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2010. № 2. P. 29-31.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Law Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

PREJUDICIAL IMPORTANCE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES DEFINED BY JUDGEMENT OF COURT OF GENERAL JURISDICTION ACCORDING TO ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROCEDURE WHILE INVESTIGATING INSURANCE ARGUMENTS IN ARBITRATION COURT

Yermolayeva Yekaterina Aleksandrovna
Limited Joint-Stock Company Intersectoral Insurance Center
Saratov

Abstract. The article is devoted to the question of prejudice admission of judgments made by general jurisdiction courts and being out of administrative procedure and concerning the established facts which are related to a matter being investigated by arbitration court. The author analyzes the main problems of prejudice institution use by arbitration courts by the example of court practice of investigation of insurance arguments resulted from the contract of property insurance.
Key words and phrases: арбитражный процесс, преюдиция, административное судопроизводство, договор страхования, страховой спор, arbitration process, prejudice, contract of insurance, insurance argument
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Bezrukov A. M. Preyuditsial'naya svyaz' sudebnykh aktov. M.: Volters Kluver, 2007.
  2. Degtyarev S. L. Voprosy preyuditsii v sovremennom arbitrazhnom protsesse [Elektronnyi resurs] // Praktika. Kommentarii. Obzory. 2005. № 2 (22). URL: http://archive.fasuo.ru (data obrashcheniya: 25.09.2009).
  3. Kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu RF / pod red. G. A. Zhilina. M.: TK Velbi, 2004.
  4. Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sporov o vozmeshchenii vreda FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 11.12.2008 g. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2009).
  5. Opredelenie VAS RF ot 5 fevralya 2007 g. № 13988/06 po delu № A63-6407/2006-S7 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy "Konsul'tant Plyus".
  6. Opredelenie VAS RF ot 18.10.2007 № 7703/07 po delu № A65-7569/2006-SA1-42 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy "Konsul'tant Plyus".
  7. Panova I. V. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo - vid sudoproizvodstva v RF // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2003. № 1.
  8. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 19 dekabrya 2003 g. № 23 "O sudebnom reshenii" // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2003. 26 dekabrya.
  9. Fursov D. A. Protsessual'nyi rezhim deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnogo suda pervoi instantsii. M., 1997.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru