Artificially generated academic text (а linguopragmatic aspect)
Cherkasova Marina Nikolaevna, Taktarova Anna Valer’evna
Rostov State Transport University
Submitted: 11.06.2024
Abstract. In the process of integrating ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) technologies into academic discourse, the procedure of writing an academic text is changing, and a new type of communicative interaction is formed – AI as the author of a ‘generated text’ (GТ) and a human being as the recipient of a text from AI. The aim of the study is to substantiate the perception of such a text by the recipient from the point of view of pragmalinguistic analysis on the basis of the identified features and indicators. An analysis of the functioning of artificially generated academic text is presented (5 scientific texts were generated by the Mahtext system). For the first time machine text is considered as an ‘speech act’ in three directions of its realisation: plan of expression, content and prediction. It is revealed that the neural network as a text author cannot transform and convey any attitude to the addressee (recipient), just as it cannot consciously influence him through its texts and have pragmatic intentions. The novelty of the study consists in the following: 1) for the first time we consider not an anthropological text, but an AI text; 2) as a result of pragmalinguistic analysis are revealed 7 main features and 7 indicators of GT; 3) the concept of ‘artificial speech act’ is proposed for the first time.
Key words and phrases: академический текст, генерация текста, искусственный интеллект, искусственный речевой акт, academic text, text generation, artificial intelligence, artificial speech act
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Arutyunova N. D. Pragmatika // Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / gl. red. V. N. Yartseva. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1990.
Bezuglyi T. A., Ershova M. E. Ispol'zovanie tekstovykh neirosetei i iskusstvennogo intellekta v uchebnykh rabotakh studentov // Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya. 2023. № 5.
Vezhbitskaya A. Rechevye akty // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M.: Progress, 1985. Vyp. XVI. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika / sost. i vstup. st. N. D. Arutyunovoi i E. V. Paduchevoi; obshch. red. E. V. Paduchevoi.
Karasik V. I. Struktura institutsional'nogo diskursa // Problemy rechevoi kommunikatsii: mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Saratov: Saratovskii natsional'nyi issledovatel'skii gosudarstvennyi universitet imeni N. G. Chernyshevskogo, 2000.
Kononenko A. P. Populyarizatsiya chat-botov v lingvisticheskom i metodicheskom aspektakh // Trudy 20-i Yubileinoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Prepodavatel' vysshei shkoly v XXI veke». Rostov n/D: Rostov. gos. un-t putei soobshcheniya, 2023. Sb. 20. Ch. 2.
Korotkina I. B. Otsenka akademicheskogo i nauchnogo teksta v trekh izmereniyakh akademicheskoi gramotnosti // Tsennosti i smysly. 2017. № 6.
Matveeva G. G. Aktualizatsiya pragmaticheskogo aspekta nauchnogo teksta. Rostov n/D: RGU, 1984.
Ostin Dzh. L. Slovo kak deistvie // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M., 1986. Vyp. XVII. Teoriya rechevykh aktov / sost. i vstupit. st. I. M. Kobozevoi i V. Z. Dem'yankova; obshch. red. B. Yu. Gorodetskogo.
Pisar' N. V. Potentsial ispol'zovaniya neirosetei kak innovatsionnogo instrumenta sozdaniya uchebnogo kontenta i sredstva organizatsii interaktivnoi obrazovatel'noi sredy na zanyatiyakh po russkomu yazyku kak inostrannomu // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2024. T. 17. Vyp. 1. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240009
Taktarova A. V., Cherkasova M. N. Lingvopragmaticheskii aspekt issledovaniya komicheskogo tsifrovogo poliloga // Rol' i status yazyka v tsivilizatsionnom prostranstve: sbornik statei II mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 20-21 noyabrya 2023 g.). SPb.: Peterburgskii gosudarstvennyi universitet putei soobshcheniya Imperatora Aleksandra I, 2024.
Cheremokhina D. A., Stebunova K. K. Dezintegratsiya teksta v akademicheskom diskurse // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2018. T. 160. Kn. 5.
Cherkasova M. N., Taktarova A. V. Semantika i pragmatika sovremennykh media v aspekte manipulyativnogo vozdeistviya na pokolenie Z // Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki. 2023. T. 27. № 3. https://doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2023-3-30-42
Altmäe S., Sola-Leyva A., Salumets A. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: A friend or a foe? // Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2023. Vol. 47. Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009
Gao C. A., Howard F. M., Markov N. S., Dyer E. C., Ramesh S., Luo Y., Pearson A. T.Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers // npj Digital Medicine. 2023. Vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6
Giglio A. D., Costa M. U. P. D. The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native English speakers // Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2023. Vol. 69 (9). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20230560
Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove // Nature. 2023. Vol. 613. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Русский
