ONE’S OWN – ALIEN dichotomy: Value determinants of semantics (based on Russian and English languages)
Muravleva Valeriya Romanovna, Romanov Aleksandr Sergeevich, Klimenko Mikhail Borisovich
Military University of the Russian Federation Ministry of Defense
Moscow’s MGIMO University
Submitted: 10.04.2024
Abstract. The aim of the research is to determine the axiological grounds for the interpretation of the dichotomous group ONE’S OWN – ALIEN by an individual during verbal communication. The scientific novelty of the research is determined by the comprehensive psycho- and pragmalinguistic approach to the study of the category of value being transmitted via “one’s own” and “alien” which made it possible to consider the dichotomy as a relatively stable evaluative and emotional system of meanings formed through the superposition of several individual mental spaces. The author presents the dichotomous group ONE’S OWN – ALIEN as a regulator of valuable, spiritual and practical mastery of the world. The authors connect the processes of understanding and interpretation of ONE’S OWN and ALIEN with the aims of activity (verbal as well as non-verbal) of a typical representative of a sociocultural community in combination with the peculiarities of the macrocommunicative situation. As a result of the research, it was proved that the dichotomous group ONE’S OWN – ALIEN was a verbalized archetypal result of the process of understanding and categorization of value-coloured senses being transmitted in specific conditions of communication and allowing to structure interpersonal communication.
Key words and phrases: ценностная детерминация семантики, дихотомия СВОЙ – ЧУЖОЙ, психосемантика, субъективная семантика, речедеятельностный подход, value determination of semantics, ONE’S OWN – ALIEN dichotomy, psychosemantics, subjective semantics, speech activity approach
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Anan'ev B. G. O problemakh sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya. M.: Nauka, 1977.
Baeva L. V. Tsennostnye osnovaniya bytiya // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2003. № 5.
Barabanshchikov V. A. Psikhologiya vospriyatiya: organizatsiya i razvitie pertseptivnogo protsessa. M.: Kogito-Tsentr – Vysshaya shkola psikhologii, 2006.
Vitgenshtein L. Logiko-filosofskii traktat. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1958.
Vodak R. Yazyk. Diskurs. Politika / per. s angl. i nem. V. I. Karasika, N. N. Troshinoi. Volgograd: Peremena, 1997.
Gorina E. V. Kommunikativnye tekhnologii manipulyatsii v SMI i voprosy informatsionnoi bezopasnosti: ucheb.-metod. posobie / nauch. red. E. V. Chepkina; M-vo obrazovaniya i nauki Ros. Federatsii, Ural. feder. un-t. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2016.
Danilova A. A. Manipulirovanie slovom v sredstvakh massovoi informatsii. M.: Dobrosvet; KDU, 2009.
Znakov V. V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2016.
Kalinin O. I., Knyazeva E. G. Informatsionnaya voina s pozitsii kognitivno-diskursivnogo podkhoda // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2023. № 3-2 (54).
Kalinin O. I., Prikhod'ko M. V. Informatsionnaya voina: kommunikativnyi, diskursivnyi, kognitivnyi i kul'turno-ideologicheskii aspekty // Voenno-filologicheskii zhurnal. 2023. № 1.
Leont'ev D. A. Ot sotsial'nykh tsennostei k lichnostnym: sotsiogenez i fenomenologiya tsennostnoi regulyatsii deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya. 1996. № 4.
Leont'ev D. A. Tsennost' // Bol'shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya: v 35-ti t. M., 2017. T. 34.
Losskii N. O. Osnovnye svoistva tsennosti // Losskii N. O. Bog i mirovoe zlo / sost. A. P. Polyakov, P. V. Alekseev, A. A. Yakovlev. M.: Respublika, 1994.
Luriya A. R. Yazyk i soznanie. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1979.
Muravleva V. R. Pragmalingvisticheskie osobennosti kommunikativnoi situatsii «informatsionnaya voina» (na materiale pechatnykh tekstov SMI): diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2021.
Norman B. Yu. Leksicheskie fantomy s tochki zreniya lingvistiki i kul'turologii // Yazyk i kul'tura: dokl. tret'ei mezhdunar. konf. K., 1994.
Petrenko V. F. Put' v psikhologiyu: o stanovlenii eksperimental'noi psikhosemantiki // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2022. № 4.
Petrenko V. F., Suprun A. P. Vliyanie sistemy referentsii na konstruirovanie obraza mira v psikhologii i fizike // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. T. 42. № 4.
Prokhorov A. O. Smyslovaya regulyatsiya psikhicheskikh sostoyanii. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2009.
Sidorova N. A., Vasil'kova L. I. Aksiologicheskii faktor v realizatsii politiki «dvoinykh standartov» (na materiale analiza ukrainoyazychnogo politicheskogo diskursa) // Voenno-gumanitarnyi al'manakh: materialy XVII mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii po aktual'nym problemam yazyka i kommunikatsii (g. Moskva, 30 iyunya 2023 g.) / Voennyi universitet. M.: Voennyi universitet, 2023.
Stolin V. V. Samosoznanie lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1983.
Tarasov E. F. Problema analiza soderzhaniya obshchechelovecheskikh tsennostei // Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2012. № 15.
Tarasov E. F. Yazyki soznaniya // Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2015. № 24.
Tikhomirov O. K. Teoreticheskie problemy issledovaniya bessoznatel'nogo // Voprosy psikhologii. 1981. № 2.
Khabarov A. A. Etnokognitivnye osnovy informatsionno-psikhologicheskogo vozdeistviya v kommunikativnoi dinamike diskursa: diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2023.
Русский
