Features of the functioning of peripheral punctuation marks in the epistolary texts by semiliterate authors
Bageeva Olga Olegovna
Russian State University for the Humanities
Submitted: 08.02.2024
Abstract. The research aims to identify the established norm of using peripheral punctuation marks in epistolary texts and to evaluate the functioning of peripheral punctuation in the letters by semiliterate authors relative to this norm. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the first-ever examination of the functions of peripheral punctuation marks in the context of the private official letters written by semiliterate authors. Additionally, the notion of a fixed function was introduced for the first time as a tool necessary for investigating whether peripheral punctuation marks are used in accordance with the norm established within a specific textual genre. The research findings showed that the use of peripheral punctuation in the letters by semiliterate authors may deviate from the generally accepted punctuation norm in the epistolary genre. It was found that norm violations primarily occur in the use of spatial-graphic signs, such as paragraph breaks, text column changes, increased line spacing and spacing between words. As a result of the study on the functioning of peripheral marks in the letters by semiliterate individuals, the following features of peripheral punctuation were also identified: the interchangeability and universalization of punctuation marks, as well as the standardization of their functions.
Key words and phrases: пунктуация, периферия пунктуации, функции пунктуационных знаков, письма, малограмотность, punctuation, peripheral punctuation, functions of punctuation marks, letters, semiliteracy
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Androsova F. S. Punktuatsionnye znaki v khudozhestvennom tekste: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii aspekt. SPb.: Lan', 2018.
Belokoneva K. A. Tipichnye yazykovye oshibki v kursakh distantsionnogo obucheniya // Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi filologii i zhurnalistiki. 2021. № 3 (42).
Belunova N. I. Kategoriya integratsii i osobennosti ee realizatsii v tekste druzheskogo pis'ma (na materiale pisem tvorcheskoi intelligentsii kontsa XIX – pervoi chetverti XX veka) // Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. S. A. Esenina. 2016. № 2 (51).
Din Ts. Neodnoznachnyi paragraf: problemy upotrebleniya propisnoi bukvy v kontekstakh «osobogo vysokogo smysla» // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya. 2022. № 2.
Dunev A. I. Dinamika orfograficheskoi normy: propisnaya i strochnaya bukvy v sovremennoi pis'mennoi rechi // Vestnik Gertsenovskogo universiteta. 2007. № 12 (50).
Zhdanov S. S., Nedostup O. I., Pleshivtseva E. Yu. Semantiko-pragmaticheskii potentsial emodzi v kontekste pandemii Covid-19 // Nauchnyi dialog. 2021. № 10.
Zemskaya E. A. Pis'ma prostorechno govoryashchikh kak istochnik izucheniya nekodifitsirovannykh sfer russkogo yazyka i gorodskoi subkul'tury // Rusistika. Slavistika. Indoevropeistika: sb. k 60-letiyu A. A. Zaliznyaka. M.: Indrik, 1996.
Kalinina M. V., Kalinina M. A. Konfliktogennost' form tsifrovoi kommunikatsii v aspekte lingvisticheskoi bezopasnosti (na materiale kommentariev k blogam platformy «Yandeks Dzen») // Vestnik Baltiiskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Filologiya, pedagogika, psikhologiya. 2023. № 2.
Karpukhina V. N. «Novaya sistema» znakov prepinaniya v situatsiyakh texting/messaging: final'nyi punktuatsionnyi znak vyskazyvaniya kak emotsiogennyi faktor // Chelovek: obraz i sushchnost'. Gumanitarnye aspekty. 2021. № 2 (46).
Kuchigina S. K. Yazyk sotsial'nykh setei: tendentsii razvitiya // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya. 2021. № 5.
Lebedeva N. B. Estestvennaya pis'mennaya russkaya rech' kak proyavlenie povsednevnoi narodnoi kul'tury // Antropotekst-1: sb. statei. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 2006.
Lebedeva N. B. Issledovanie estestvennoi pis'mennoi russkoi rechi kak napravlenie izucheniya yazyka goroda // Problemy sovremennoi lingvistiki i metodiki prepodavaniya yazykovykh kursov: tr. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Kemerovo, 4 iyulya 2008 g.). Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2008.
Nikolenkova N. V. Bytovaya orfografiya i punktuatsiya kak priznak pravopisnoi situatsii v russkom yazyke nachala XXI veka // Filologiya i chelovek. 2022. № 2.
Preobrazhenskaya M. N. Sluzhebnye sredstva v istorii sintaksicheskogo stroya russkogo yazyka XI-XVII vv.: slozhnopodchinennoe predlozhenie. M.: Institut rus. yaz. AN SSSR, 1991.
Reformatskii A. A. O perekodirovanii i transformatsii kommunikativnykh sistem // Issledovaniya po strukturnoi tipologii / otv. red. T. N. Moloshnaya. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963.
Reformatskii A. A. Tekhnicheskaya redaktsiya knigi: teoriya i metodika raboty. M.: Gizlegprom, 1933.
Ryabova A. S. Lingvisticheskie osobennosti angloyazychnogo diskursa sotsial'nykh setei // Ogarev-Online. 2020. № 6 (143).
Severskaya O. I., Selezneva L. V. O biznes-punktuatsii: znaki prepinaniya ili pretknoveniya? // Russkaya rech'. 2021. № 2.
Sigal K. Ya. Razvitie teorii punktuatsii v pervoi chetverti XXI veka: osnovnye tendentsii // Nauchnyi dialog. 2022. T. 11. № 2.
Khakimova E. M. O punktuatsionnykh oshibkakh v tekstakh sovremennykh rossiiskikh zhurnalistov // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. № 24.
Shvartskopf B. S. Sovremennaya russkaya punktuatsiya: sistema i ee funktsionirovanie. M.: Nauka, 1988.
Shirokova E. N. Kosaya cherta i defis: punktuatsionnyi vs. orfograficheskii znak // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Filologiya. 2019. № 5.
Русский
