Argumentative explication of the text of parliamentary speeches at the micro level (based on the French language)
Gavrishina Irina Nikolaevna
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Submitted: 08.01.2024
Abstract. The research aims to identify functional types of semantic dependence within a fragment of the text of parliamentary speeches – the argumentative component. The paper examines the notion of an argumentative component and identifies its main elements. To establish an intentionally determined semantic dependence within this text segment, the notion of an argumentative move (AM) is introduced, which is understood as a functional unit of the addresser’s general communicative strategy and which is aimed at realizing a specific communicative intention. The relations of the functional-semantic connection, updating its argumentative moves, as well as the linguistic means that represent them are described. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that based on the material of the French language, it typologizes the relations of semantic dependence at the micro level of the argumentative construction of the text of parliamentary speeches, taking into account the functional-communicative aspect. As a result of the research, the intentionally determined semantic relations typical for the corpus of texts under study were determined: proper causation (AM ‘causal basis’), nonproper causation (AM ‘argument’), consequence (AM ‘conclusion’), concession (AM ‘insufficient basis’), disjunctiveness (AM ‘expanded alternative’ and AM ‘alternative motivation’), their linguistic markers were identified and systematized.
Key words and phrases: аргументация, интенционально обусловленные смысловые отношения, аргументативный ход, аргументативный компонент, языковые маркеры аргументации, argumentation, intentionally determined semantic relations, argumentative move, argumentative component, linguistic markers of argumentation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Balashova E. Yu., Belyaev A. S., Korotkova M. D. Izuchenie spetsifiki professional'noi kommunikatsii cherez diskurs-analiz // Yazyk nauki i professional'naya kommunikatsiya. 2022. № 1 (6).
Gak V. G. Teoreticheskaya grammatika frantsuzskogo yazyka. Sintaksis. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1986.
Gallo Ya., Alefirenko N. F. Lingvistika teksta: traditsii i perspektivy // Filologicheskii klass. 2020. T. 25. № 3.
Ivanova Yu. E., Maznichka M. R. Argumentativnyi diskurs: osobennosti ubezhdeniya v russkoyazychnoi i angloyazychnoi rechi // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2022. T. 15. Vyp. 12. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220709
Karasik V. I. Diskursologiya kak napravlenie kommunikativnoi lingvistiki // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2016. № 1 (21).
Kim G. V. Konnektory kak sredstva vyrazheniya tekstovykh svyazei v russkom diskurse // Aktual'nye problemy sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh nauk i metodiki ikh prepodavaniya: mat. vseros. nauch.-prakt. foruma. Voronezh, 2022.
Korneva V. V. Strategii argumentatsii v ispanskom parlamentskom diskurse // Yazyk, kommunikatsiya i sotsial'naya sreda. 2020. № 8.
Kosmodem'yanskaya V. I. Strategii i taktiki v argumentativnom polemicheskom diskurse // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2016. № 1 (55).
Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa: monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2003.
Nekrasova M. Yu., Mirontseva S. S., Baiko V. A. Markery argumentatsii v angloyazychnykh nauchnykh stat'yakh gumanitarnogo i estestvenno-nauchnogo napravlenii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2021. T. 14. Vyp. 11. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil210550
Savchuk T. N. Argumentativnyi diskurs: vektory lingvisticheskogo analiza // Yazyk – tekst – diskurs: diskursivnoe izmerenie yazykovykh protsessov: sb. nauch. st. po materialam VIII mezhdunar. nauch. konf. / otv. red. N. A. Ilyukhina. Samara: Samar. gumanitar. akad., 2022.
Chernyavskaya V. E. Lingvistika teksta. Lingvistika diskursa. M.: Flinta, 2013.
Adam J.-M. La linguistique textuelle.Introduction à l’analyse textuelle des discours. 4 éd. P.: A. Colin, 2020.
Doury M. Argumentation. Analyser textes et discours. 2 éd. P.: A. Colin, 2021.
Ducrot O. Opérateurs argumentatifs et visée argumentative // Cahiers de linguistique française. 1983. № 5.
Moeschler J. Argumentation et conversation: éléments pour une analyse pragmatique. P.: Hachette, 1985.
Plantin C. Les instruments de structuration des séquences argumentatives // Verbum. 2010. Vol. XXXII. № 1.
Vazquez-Molina J., Alvarez-Prendes E., Castro A. Des mots du discours aux marqueurs discursifs: quelques pistes de réflexion // Çédille. Revista de estudios franceses. 2023. № 23 (avril).
Русский
