GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2024. № 10. P. 3785-3793.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240535

Verbal aggression towards women in English-language online discourse

Nikolaeva Tatiana Yurievna
Moscow City University


Submitted: 19.09.2024
Abstract. The research aims to identify the most prevalent forms and categories of verbal aggression directed at women in English-language online communities. The article examines the characteristics of this phenomenon using the example of three clusters of online communities that differ in the level of expression and typology of gender-oriented insults. The analysis covers both specialized communities where gender issues are at the center of discussions and groups dedicated to more general topics. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that it is the first work to identify and classify types of verbal aggression directed at women and the sociocultural factors that condition them in English-language online communities with different thematic focuses. As a result of the research, it was demonstrated that gender-motivated aggression is primarily expressed through verbal means such as invectives, market metaphors, evaluative adjectives with negative connotations, and generalizing expressions. The main motivating sociocultural factors are dominant gender stereotypes, patriarchal attitudes, and misogynistic narratives, encountered not only in niche but also in broader-themed online spaces.
Key words and phrases: вербальная агрессия, онлайн-дискурс, английский язык, гендерная дискриминация, женоненавистнические дискурсивные практики, verbal aggression, online discourse, English language, gender discrimination, misogynistic discourse practices
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Baranova K. M., Afanas'eva O. V. Evfemizatsiya rechi na sovremennom etape razvitiya angliiskogo yazyka // Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2021. № 1 (41).
  2. Goroshko E. I. Internet-zhanr i funktsionirovanie yazyka v Internete: popytka refleksii // Zhanry rechi: sbornik nauchnykh statei. Saratov: ITs «Nauka», 2009. Vyp. 6. Zhanr i yazyk.
  3. Grinev-Grinevich S. V. Teoriya yazyka: antropolingvistika: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Izdatel'skii dom VKN, 2021.
  4. Kurganskaya E. V., Stepanova N. V. Vyyavlenie «toksichnosti» v sotsial'nykh setyakh na osnovanii kriteriya semanticheskoi blizosti // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2024. T. 17. Vyp. 5.
  5. Bailey A. H., Williams A., Cimpian A. Based on billions of words on the internet, people = men // Science Advances. 2022. Vol. 8. Iss. 13.
  6. Bodine A. Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’ // Language in Society. 1975. Vol. 4. Iss. 2.
  7. Bousfield D. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2008.
  8. Brown P., Levinson St. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  9. Chupryna O. G., Baranova K. M. Social and Cultural Values in American Web-Based Discourse // Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics. 2022. No. 4.
  10. Culpeper J. Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast // Journal of Pragmatics. 2021. Vol. 179.
  11. Culpeper J. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  12. Culpeper J. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1996. Vol. 25. Iss. 3.
  13. DeFranza D., Mishra H., Mishra A. How language shapes prejudice against women: An examination across 45 world languages // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2020. Vol. 119. Iss. 1.
  14. Dynel M. Desperately seeking intentions: Genuine and jocular insults on social media // Journal of Pragmatics. 2021. Vol. 179.
  15. Dynel M. The landscape of impoliteness research // Journal of Politeness Research. 2015. Vol. 11. Iss. 2.
  16. Felmlee D., Inara Rodis P., Zhang A. Sexist Slurs: Reinforcing Feminine Stereotypes Online // Sex Roles. 2020. Vol. 83.
  17. Fontanella L., Chulvi B., Ignazzi E., Sarra A., Tontodimamma A. How do we study misogyny in the digital age? A systematic literature review using a computational linguistic approach // Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024. Vol. 11.
  18. Goffman E.Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. N. Y.: Anchor Books, 1967.
  19. Grice H. P. Logic and Conversation // The Logic of Grammar / ed. by D. Davidson. Encino: Dickenson Publishing Company, 1975.
  20. Herring S. C.Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior // Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning / ed. by S. A. Barab, R. Kling, J. H. Gray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  21. James D. Gender-Linked Derogatory Terms and Their Use by Women and Men // American Speech. 1998. Vol. 73. Iss. 4.
  22. Jane E. Misogyny Online: A Short (and Brutish) History. SAGE Swifts, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473916029
  23. Kremin L. V. Sexist swearing and slurs: Responses to gender-directed insults // LingUU. 2017. Vol. 1. Iss. 1.
  24. Lakoff R. Language and Woman’s Place // Language in Society. 1973. Vol. 2. Iss. 1.
  25. Locher M. A., Bousfield D. Chapter 1.Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language // Impoliteness in Language. Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice / ed. by D. Bousfield, M. A. Locher. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008.
  26. Maarouf A., Pröllochs N., Feuerriegel S. The Virality of Hate Speech on Social Media // Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. N. Y.: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024. Vol. 8. Iss. CSCW1 / ed. by J. Nichols.
  27. McCulloch G. Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. N. Y.: Riverhead, 2019.
  28. Merchant K. How Men and Women Differ: Gender Differences in Communication Styles, Influence Tactics, and Leadership Styles // CMC Senior Theses. 2012. Paper 513.
  29. Rösner L., Krämer N. C. Verbal Venting in the Social Web: Effects of Anonymity and Group Norms on Aggressive Language Use in Online Comments // Social Media + Society. 2016. Vol. 2. Iss. 3.
  30. Salter M. Crime, Justice and Social Media. L.: Routledge, 2017.
  31. Thurlow C. Digital discourse: Locating language in new/social media // The SAGE Handbook of Social Media / ed. by J. Burgess, I. Poell, A. Marwick. N. Y.: SAGE Publications, 2017.
  32. Weatherall A. Gender, Language and Discourse. Hove: Routledge, 2005.
  33. Wollebæk D., Karlsen R., Steen-Johnsen K., Enjolras B. Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers: The Emotional Basis for Online Behavior // Social Media + Society. 2019. Vol. 5. Iss. 2.
  34. Zimmerman A. G., Ybarra G. J. Online aggression: The influences of anonymity and social modeling // Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 2016. Vol. 5. Iss. 2.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru