GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2023. № 9. P. 2741-2751.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230430

Voice onset time in plosive occlusives in the oral speech of monolinguals in Russia

Vikhrova Anastasia Yurjevna, Lypkan Tatiana Vitaljevna
Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov

Saint Petersburg State University


Submitted: 10.07.2023
Abstract. The aim of the study is to identify the features of unvoiced and voiced plosive occlusives realised in the speech of monolinguals in Russia when reading a phonetically representative text aloud. It should be noted that the study is novel in that it is the first in Russian linguistics to use the parameter of voice onset time (VOT) to determine the voicing/devoicing of plosive occlusives. The authors consider VOT to be the most reliable acoustic parameter. As a result of the study, it was found that in the speech of Russian monolinguals, VOT was most often implemented incorrectly (positive VOT instead of negative), which is especially exemplified by the material of words starting with the sound [d] and one word in the speech of mostly adults, which is associated with speech fluency. The presence of pauses helped children to pronounce unvoiced and voiced consonants more correctly. Unvoiced consonants were pronounced instead of voiced ones in the speech of adult monolinguals. It should be said that other trends were noted in the speech of bilinguals. Basically, the range of voicing did not correspond to the reference values in both languages (Russian and German). Bilingual adults and children had their own system of parameters. As for unvoiced consonants, their values almost completely corresponded to the reference values of the Russian language, except for the consonant /k/.
Key words and phrases: время начала озвончения, глухие и звонкие взрывные смычные согласные, межъязыковая фонетическая интерференция, русскоязычные монолингвы России, voice onset time, unvoiced and voiced plosive occlusives, interlanguage phonetic interference, Russian-speaking monolinguals of Russia
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Dittmers T. I. Realizatsiya glukhikh i zvonkikh smychnykh soglasnykh v nemetsko-russkom yazykovom kontakte: vremya nachala ozvoncheniya // Problemy ontolingvistiki – 2017. Osvoenie i funktsionirovanie yazyka v situatsii mnogoyazychiya: mat. ezhegod. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 26-28 iyunya 2017 g.) / pod red. T. A. Kruglyakovoi, M. A. Elivanovoi, T. A. Ushakovoi. Ivanovo: Listos, 2017.
  2. Lypkan' T. V. Dinamika foneticheskikh mezhpokolencheskikh izmenenii glukhosti i zvonkosti smychnykh vzryvnykh soglasnykh v russkoi rechi bilingvov Germanii // Filologicheskie nauki: nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. 2022. № S6. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6s-22.010
  3. Lypkan' T. V., Khromov S. S. Glukhost' – zvonkost' smychnykh vzryvnykh soglasnykh v russkoi rechi vzroslykh-bilingvov v Germanii // Filologicheskie nauki: nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. 2020. № 1. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.1-20.025
  4. Stepanova S. B. Foneticheskie svoistva russkoi rechi: realizatsiya i transkriptsiya: avtoref. diss. ... k. filol. n. L., 1988.
  5. Foneticheskii aspekt obshcheniya na nerodnom yazyke: kollektivnaya monografiya / nauch. red. N. A. Lyubimova. SPb.: Filologicheskii fakul'tet SPbGU, 2006.
  6. Shevchenko T. I., Buraya E. A., Galochkina I. E., Kuz'mina M. O., Sokoreva T. V., Fedotova M. V. Sotsiofoneticheskie metody analiza zvuchashchei rechi: ucheb. posobie dlya bakalavrov, magistrov, aspirantov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nostyam napravleniya «Lingvistika». Dubna: Feniks+, 2015.
  7. Ashby P. Understanding Phonetics. L. – N. Y.: Taylor and Francis Group, 2011.
  8. Barry S. M. E. Variation in Vocal Fold Vibration during Voiced Obstruents in Russian // European Journal of Disorders of Communication. 1995. Vol. 30 (2). https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829509082523
  9. Beckman J., Jessen M., Ringen C. Empirical Evidence for Laryngeal Features: Aspirating vs. True Voice Languages // Journal of Linguistics. 2013. Vol. 49 (2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000424
  10. Braun A. Zur regionalen Distribution von VOT im Deutschen // Untersuchungen zu Stimme und Sprache / hrsg. von A. Braun. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1996.
  11. Brehmer B., Kurbangulova T. Lost in Transmission? Family Language Input and Its Role for the Development of Russian as a Heritage Language in Germany // Integration, Identity and Language Maintenance in Young Immigrants: Russian Germans or German Russians / ed. by L. Isurin, C. M. Riehl. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017.
  12. Cho T., Ladefoged P. Variation and Universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 Languages // Journal of Phonetics. 1999. No. 27.
  13. Flege J. The Production of “New” and “Similar” Phones in a Foreign Language: Evidence for the Effect of Equivalence Classification // Journal of Phonetics. 1987. No. 15.
  14. Lisker L., Abramson A. S. A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurement // Word. 1964. Vol. 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
  15. Ringen C., Kulikov V. Voicing in Russian Stops: Cross-Linguistic Implications // Journal of Slavic Linguistics. 2012. Vol. 20 (2).

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru