Linguo-semiotic portrait of the Königsberg hermit: Immanuel Kant
Sedykh Arkadiy Petrovich
Moscow International University; Belgorod National Research University
Submitted: 23.04.2023
Abstract. The aim of the research is to identify the general linguistic, general cultural and ethnocultural features of the linguistic personality of the 19th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant. The scientific novelty of the research consists in highlighting the features of the cognitive-discourse constructions of the Königsberg thinker’s linguistic personality in line with the study of the linguo-semiotic mechanisms of functioning of special terms, both in the space of a complete utterance and at the level of the universal foundation of a philosophical narrative. One of the key points of the work is the development of the concept of linguo-semiotic interpretation of the category “linguistic personality”, which is considered as a semiotic integrity and axiological construct functioning in the synergy of two formats: individual and universal identity. The basic element of identifying the signs of a linguistic personality of this type is the linguistic analysis of the discourse, which generates authentic parameters for the functioning of the philosopher’s linguistic cognition. The cognitive and epistemic dimension of knowledge lays the foundation for the potential development of research thought in line with conducting a conceptual and linguistic analysis of the text space. The research findings showed the predominance of the universal characteristics of the German thinker’s philosophical discourse and also made it possible to discover the information about the elements of his worldview and mentality as a native speaker of a national language at the level of linguistic personality. The data obtained made it possible to identify the features of Immanuel Kant’s linguistic personality that are relevant for modern methods of overcoming crisis and stress situations on the paths of existential stabilization of behavioral cognition and communication models.
Key words and phrases: философия языка, языковая личность, эпистемологический дискурс, философская картина мира, лингвокультура, philosophy of language, linguistic personality, epistemological discourse, philosophical worldview, linguoculture
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Aznacheeva E. N. K probleme tipologizatsii professional'noi yazykovoi lichnosti muzykanta // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 43.
Berdyaeva N. A. Yazykovaya lichnost' Berdyaeva. 2006. URL: https://sci.house/filosofskie-issledovaniya-sovremennyie-scibook/yazyikovaya-lichnost-berdyaeva-9656.html
Bushev A. B. Yazykovaya lichnost' professional'nogo perevodchika: monografiya. Tver': Laboratoriya delovoi grafiki, 2010.
Gorelov I. N., Sedov K. F. Osnovy psikholingvistiki: uch. pos. Izd-e 3-e, pererab. i dop. M.: Labirint, 2001.
Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii na nemetskom i russkom yazykakh: v 5-ti t. M.: Nauka, 2006. T. 2. Ch. 1 / podgot. N. Motroshilovoi i T. Dlugach (Moskva), B. Tushlingom i U. Fogelem (Marburg).
Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii: v 8-mi t. / pod obshch. red. A. V. Gulygi. Yubileinoe izdanie, 1794-1994. M.: ChORO, 1994. T. 3-8.
Karasik V. I. Evolyutsiya i involyutsiya kontseptov // Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: problemy lingvokontseptologii i lingvokul'turnykh tipazhei: sb. nauch. st. / pod red. N. A. Krasavskogo. Volgograd, 2007.
Kyzydub N. N. Strategicheskii instrumentarii diskursivnogo prostranstva // Magister Dixit. 2011. № 2 (06).
Neroznak V. P. Lingvisticheskaya personologiya: k opredeleniyu statusa distsipliny // Yazyk. Poetika. Perevod: sb. nauch. tr. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 1996.
Parsamova V. Ya. Yazykovaya lichnost' uchenogo v epistolyarnykh tekstakh: na materiale pisem Yu. M. Lotmana: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Saratov, 2004.
Portnov A. N. Yazykovoe soznanie i yazykovaya lichnost' Martina Khaideggera (opyt rekonstruktsii). 2006. URL: http://main.isuct.ru/files/publ/vgf/2006/01/157.html
Sedykh A. P. Kontekst. Znak. Obraz. Belgorod: Izd-vo Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1998.
Sedykh A. P. Yazyk, kul'tura, kommunikatsiya: frantsuzskii mir: monografiya. Belgorod: Epitsentr, 2022.
Charaudeau P. Identité linguistique, identité culturelle: une relation paradoxale. 2009. URL: http://www.patrick-charaudeau.com/Identite-linguistique-identite.html
Cossutta F. Neutralisation du point de vue et stratégies argumentatives dans le discours philosophique. 2004. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/semen/2321
David-Ménard M. Kant et Freud pensent-ils dans la même langue? 2000. URL: http://books.openedition.org/psorbonne/16034
Donneau O. Des savants en société: les penseurs du XVIIe siècle au travail // L’émergence de la modernité: histoire des idées au XVIIe siècle / sous la dir. d’A. Staquet. Mons: Université de Mons, 2011.
Droit R.-P. Un voyage dans les philosophies du monde. P.: Albin-Michel, 2021.
Hervet C. Langage et pouvoir dans le ‘Traité politique’ de Spinoza // Philonsorbonne. 2007. Nu. 1. Année 2006-2007. https://doi.org/10.4000/philonsorbonne.109
Identités sociales et discursives / sous la dir. de P. Charaudeau. P.: Harmattan, 2009.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. Le discours en interaction. P.: Dunod, 2005.
Kristeva J. Le Temps sensible. Proust et l’expérience littéraire. P.: Folio Essais, 2000.
Mounier E. Charles Péguy. 1993. URL: http://catho.org/9.php?d=c2t
Rastier F. Sémantique interprétative. P.: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.
Sedykh A. P., Emanuele V., Kugan E. I. Linguistic and cultural identity: Epistemological review // Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. 2022. Vol. 8. No. 3.
Sedykh A. P., Ivanishcheva O. N., Koreneva A. V., Ryzhkova I. V. Modern philological knowledge: Anthropocentrism and linguistic identity // International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE). 2018. Vol. 7. No. 4.38.
Русский
