Complex anaphor as a structural element of speech and textual strategies (on the material of the German language)
Danilova Elena Romanovna
Kuban State University
Submitted: 04.03.2023
Abstract. The aim of the study is to determine the features of complex anaphors and complex anaphoric entities as units of organisation of a textual strategy of argumentation in political discourse at the structural and pragmatic levels of language. The paper focuses on the relevance of considering political discourse to examine speech impact, summarises the existing research on Sahra Wagenknecht’s individual speech style, justifies the need to involve the textual categories of coherence and cohesion to analyse the construction of a strategy of argumentation in a text of political speech. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying correlations between the structural and pragmatic levels of the text using the example of text-forming means, i.e. complex anaphors and complex anaphoric entities. In addition, some patterns between the types of complex anaphoric entities, their strategic functions and the sequence of their use in the text were found. As a result, it was proved that complex anaphors and complex anaphoric entities, being the means of coherence of political speech, implement a textual strategy of argumentation and a speech strategy of discrediting. The study was conducted on the material of the German language.
Key words and phrases: политический дискурс, текстовая стратегия аргументации, комплексная анафора, комплексно-анафорическое единство, речевая стратегия дискредитации, political discourse, textual strategy of argumentation, complex anaphor, complex anaphoric entity, speech strategy of discrediting
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bets Yu. V., Korskova V. A. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki v sovremennom politicheskom diskurse Germanii (na primere oppozitsionnykh partii KhDS/KhSS i Levye) // Praktiki i interpretatsii: zhurnal filologicheskikh, obrazovatel'nykh i kul'turnykh issledovanii. 2016. T. 1. № 2.
Bolotova E. V., Mukhametzyanova D. R. Lingvisticheskie osobennosti politicheskogo diskursa (na materiale politicheskikh rechei Angely Merkel') // Dukhovno-nravstvennoe i patrioticheskoe vospitanie molodezhi: sb. nauch. st. po itogam vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashch. 75-letiyu Pobedy v Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine (g. Cheboksary, 1-31 maya 2020 g.). Cheboksary, 2020.
Danilova E. R. Kompleksno-anaforicheskoe edinstvo kak ob"ekt analiza diskursa // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Lingvistika». 2018. № 3.
Danilova E. R. Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya kompleksnoi anafory v politicheskom diskurse: kognitivno-referentsial'nyi i lingvopragmaticheskii aspekty: diss. ... k. filol. n. Krasnodar, 2017.
Danilova E. R., Oleinik M. A. Diskursivno-rolevaya kharakteristika kompleksnoi anafory v politicheskom diskurse SMI // Aktual'nye problemy yazykoznaniya: sb. nauch. tr. Krasnodar: Izd-vo Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017.
Issers O. S. Rechevoe vozdeistvie: uch. pos. M.: Flinta, 2009.
Komisarova T. S. Mekhanizmy rechevogo vozdeistviya i ikh realizatsiya v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale rechei G. Shredera): diss. ... k. filol. n. Orel, 2008.
Matveeva G. G. Sintaksicheskaya organizatsiya vozdeistvuyushchego teksta // Politika i politiki: politicheskii diskurs kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo analiza: mat. VIII konventa Rossiiskoi assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii (g. Moskva, aprel' 2014 g.): nauch. izd. / pod red. D. A. Kryachkova, D. N. Novikova. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2015.
Oleinik M. A., Danilova E. R. Funktsii kompleksnoi anafory v aspekte vyrazheniya sub"ektno-adresatnykh otnoshenii // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Lingvistika». 2021. № 1.
Oshchepkova N. A. Realizatsiya mekhanizmov rechevogo vozdeistviya v politicheskom diskurse // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki. 2020. № 3.
Parshina O. N. Strategii i taktiki rechevogo povedeniya sovremennoi politicheskoi elity Rossii: diss. … d. filol. n. Saratov, 2005.
Petrichenko M. V. Lichnost' Sary Vagenknekht v partiinoi sisteme FRG // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya v global'nom izmerenii: sb. nauch. tr. / pod red. A. S. Matveevskoi. SPb., 2022.
Stepanenko O. A., Tyutin N. S. Osobennosti yazykovoi lichnosti Sary Vagenknekht (diskursivnyi analiz tekstov politicheskikh vystuplenii) // Vestnik Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2016. № 1 (40).
Stepanova N. V. Lingvostilisticheskie sredstva aktualizatsii diskreditiruyushchikh taktik v zhanre amerikanskikh politicheskikh debatov // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2023. T. 16. Vyp. 1.
Tayupova O. I., Akhmadeev O. I. Grammaticheskie sredstva aktualizatsii strategii samoprezentatsii v politicheskom tekste (na primere rechi kantslera FRG Olafa Shol'tsa) // Nemetskii yazyk v Bashkortostane: problemy i perspektivy: mat. XV vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uch. (g. Ufa, 29 aprelya 2022 g.). Ufa, 2022.
Tsutsieva M. G. Diskursivnaya realizatsiya individual'noi strategii konflikta nemetskogo politika Sary Vagenknekht // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2020. T. 13. Vyp. 12.
Sheigal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000.
Bendel Larcher S. Linguistische Diskursanalyse. Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 2015.
Bußmann H. Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag, 2008.
Consten M., Knees M., Schwarz-Friesel M. The Function of Complex Anaphors in Texts // Anaphors in Texts. Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2007.
Eroms H.-W. Stil und Stilistik: Eine Einführung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 2014.
Heinemann M., Heinemann W. Grundlagen der Textlinguistik: Interaktion – Text – Diskurs. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2002.
Heinemann W. Textsorte – Textmuster – Texttyp // Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000.
Marx K. Die Verarbeitung von Komplex-Anaphern: Neurolinguistische Untersuchungen zur kognitiven Textverstehenstheorie. Berlin: TU Verlag, 2011.
Русский
