Expression of the Category of Simultaneity by Participles in the Russian Language
Lutfullina Gulnara Firdavisovna
Kazan State Power Engineering University
Submitted: 13.02.2023
Abstract. The aim of the study is to determine the stock of perfective and imperfective participles of the Russian language involved in the representation of the category of simultaneity. The study is novel in that it is the first time that present active imperfective participles are determined as the core means of representing simultaneity in correlation with the main predicates, the temporal meaning of which is irrelevant. Active perfective participles do not express simultaneity together with present-tense predicates. In terms of the past and the future, past perfective and imperfective participles can represent simultaneity under certain contextual conditions if their meaning is interpreted as an actual state (at the same time, a dual interpretation is allowed - both as a process and as a resultant state). In the conditions of competition between present and past imperfective participles, competition arises for correlation with the main past-tense predicate, while preference is given to present participles. As a result, it has been proved that in the Russian language, the potential of simultaneity representation by participles as components of a polypredicative complex is determined by their aspectual semantics.
Key words and phrases: категория одновременности, причастия, неличная форма глагола, вторичная предикация, category of simultaneity, participles, non-finite verb form, secondary predication
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Bogdanov A. V. Semantika i sintaksis otglagol'nykh ad"ektivov: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2011.
Bondarko A. V. Teoriya znacheniya v sisteme funktsional'noi grammatiki: na materiale russkogo yazyka. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2002.
Godizova Z. I., Gabisova D. V. Prichastiya kak element zavisimogo taksisa v osetinskom yazyke v sopostavlenii s russkim // Izvestiya Severo-Osetinskogo instituta gumanitarnykh i sotsial'nykh issledovanii im. V. I. Abaeva. 2019. № 31 (70).
Zel'dovich G. M. Pragmatika grammatiki. M., 2012.
Kozintseva N. A. Taksisnye funktsii, peredavaemye prichastiyami i prichastnymi oborotami, v russkom yazyke // Problemy funktsional'noi grammatiki. Semanticheskaya invariantnost'/variativnost' / otv. red. A. V. Bondarko, S. A. Shubik. SPb.: Nauka, 2003.
Krapivina K. A. Prichastnyi taksis v russkom yazyke. SPb.: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2009.
Kunavina I. I. Grammaticheskii status prichastiya v sovremennom russkom yazyke // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2016. № 2.
Lutfullina G. F. Sopostavitel'nyi analiz sredstv vyrazheniya sposobov deistviya vo frantsuzskom i tatarskom yazykakh: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Kazan', 2004.
Paducheva E. V. Semanticheskie issledovaniya: semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika narrativa. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1996.
Plungyan V. A. Prichastiya i psevdoprichastiya v russkom yazyke: o granitsakh variativnosti. M., 2010.
Rusakova M. V., Sai S. S. Konkurentsiya deistvitel'nykh prichastii proshedshego i nastoyashchego vremeni // Korpusnye issledovaniya po russkoi grammatike: sb. st. / pod red. K. L. Kiselevoi, V. A. Plungyana, E. V. Rakhilinoi. M.: Probel-2000, 2009.
Sai S. S. Prichastiya. Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoi grammatiki. 2014. URL: http://rusgram.ru/Prichastie
Silant'eva M. V. Sravnenie nefinitnoi i kombinirovannoi modeli vyrazheniya kategorii taksisa na primere russkogo i angliiskogo yazykov // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 9 (63).