The GI ethos as a part of the US cultural code (as exemplified by precedent texts of the military sublanguage)
Romanov Alexander Sergeevich, Dmitry Vladimirovich Balaganov, Muravleva Valeria Romanovna
Moscow’s MGIMO University
Russian State University for the Humanities
Moscow Power Engineering Institute
Submitted: 12.11.2023
Abstract. The paper scrutinizes professional image of the American serviceman’s world from the axiological perspective. It focuses on US national values as well as the moral and ethical image of the military cohort. The object of the study is the axiosphere of the US military society expressed in the official register of the military sublanguage. The subject area of our research embraces precedent texts of military officialese, which set forth the basis of military ethos. This research aims to identify unique value orientations attributed to the US military cohort’s members. On the one hand, these values constitute the professional ethos and, on the other hand, however, they collide with generally accepted axiological standards of the civilian mother culture. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the fact that the comparison of maternal culture values and the values of its socio-professional group of service members is conducted for the first time. Despite the abundance of publications on this issue (mainly works in sociology, psychology, medicine, and history), the phenomenon of the identity of a serviceman’s professional ethos is still insufficiently examined from the standpoint of linguocultural studies and sociolinguistics. The research findings demonstrated a partial identity of the value orientations compared. The professional environment reveals a number of values that are largely not inherent in the “civilian world”. The latter include messianism, a sense of belonging to the highest values of the nation, sacrifice of military service, collective spirit (esprit de corps), and others. This paper represents the first attempt to dissect the axiosphere of the GI through textual works of officialese. The contrastive analysis allowed us to identify the key values declared by the US defense establishment.
Key words and phrases: социальный миф, концепт, вооруженные силы США, армейский идиом, воинский этос, social myth, concept, US military, military sublanguage, military ethos
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bart R. Mifologii / per. s fr., vstup. st. i komment. S. Zenkina. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008.
Boiko B. L. Osnovy teorii sotsial'no-gruppovykh dialektov: avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2009.
Korovushkin V. P. Osnovy kontrastivnoi sotsiolektologii: monografiya: v 2-kh ch. Cherepovets: GOU VPO ChGU, 2005. Ch. I.
Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa. M.: AST, 2021.
Romanov A. S. Stereotipizatsiya subkul'turnykh konstant v aksiologii sotsial'no-gruppovogo dialekta (na materiale tsennostei i realii voennoi sluzhby v yazykovoi kul'ture SShA): diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2020.
Romanov A. S., Poluboyarova M. V., Subacheva E. G. Professional'nyi etos v rechevykh fenomenakh ofitsial'nogo registra voennogo pod"yazyka (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) // Vestnik Moskovskogo informatsionno-tekhnologicheskogo universiteta – Moskovskogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo instituta. 2023. № 1.
Sogrin V. V. Amerikanskaya imperiya. Proiskhozhdenie. Etapy. Sovremennost'. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2022.
Khaustov D. S. Lektsii po filosofii postmoderna. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2018.
Brim W. L. Impact of Military Culture on the Clinician and Clinical Practice // Military Psychologists’ Desk Reference / ed. by B. A. Moore, J. E. Barnett. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Collins J. J. The Complex Context of American Military Culture: A Practitioner’s View // Washington Quarterly. 1998. Vol. 21 (4).
Feaver P., Kohn R. The Gap: Soldiers, Civilians and Their Mutual Misunderstanding // The National Interest. 2000. Vol. 61.
Feinstein Y. The Thin Line between ‘‘Crazy’’ and ‘‘Hero’’: Exploring the Multiple Statuses of US Veterans in a Work-Therapy Program // Armed Forces & Society. 2015. Vol. 41 (1).
Foner E. What Is American Exceptionalism? // The Montreal Review. 08.08.2013. https://www.ethicsandinternationalaffairs.org/online-exclusives/what-is-american-exceptionalism
Hall L. K. Military Culture // Military Psychologists’ Desk Reference / ed. by B. A. Moore, J. E. Barnett. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Harper H. The Military and Society: Reaching and Reflecting Audiences in Fiction and Film // Armed Forces and Society. 2001. Vol. 27. No. 2.
Knopf C. M. The Comic Art of War: A Critical Study of Military Cartoons, 1805-2014, with a Guide to Artists. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2015.
Koenig C. J., Maguen S., Monroy J. D., Mayott L., Seal K. H. Facilitating Culture-Centered Communication between Health Care Providers and Veterans Transitioning from Military Deployment to Civilian Life // Patient Education and Counseling. 2014. Vol. 95.
Lewis A. R. The American Culture of War. The History of U.S. Military Force from World War II to Operation Enduring Freedom. 3rd ed. N. Y.: Routledge, 2018.
McCormick W. H., Currier J. M., Isaak S. L., Sims B. M., Slagel B. A., Carroll T. D., Hamner K., Albright D. L. Military Culture and Post-military Transitioning among Veterans: A Qualitative Analysis // Journal of Veterans Studies. 2019. Vol. 4. No. 2.
Meyer E. G., Wynn G. H. The Importance of US Military Cultural Competence // Military and Veteran Mental Health. A Comprehensive Guide / ed. by L. Weiss Roberts. N. Y.: Springer Science + Business Media, 2018.
Rahbek-Clemmensen J., Archer E. M., Barr J., Belkin A., Guerrero M., Hall C., Swain K. E. O. Conceptualizing the Civil-Military Gap: A Research Note // Armed Forces & Society. 2012. Vol. 38. No. 4.
Walt S. M. The Myth of American Exceptionalism. 11.10.2011. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/the-myth-of-american-exceptionalism/
Русский
