Methods of artistic cognition of American postmodern poets
Linnichenko Svetlana Igorevna
Samara State Technical University
Submitted: 31.08.2023
Abstract. The aim of the study is to identify the innovative methods of artistic cognition characteristic of poets in the postmodern era. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that the author identifies such methods of artistic cognition as artistic fractal, chaotic thinking, cognition through linguistic structure and interaction with the reader, the functioning of which is considered based on the American language poetry of the late 20th century. The specific characteristics of the postmodern poets’ creative thinking, expressed in a special language of lyrical texts, are determined. As a result, it has been found that the chaotic nature of modern creative thinking is realized by such linguistic means as paradox, oxymoron, paronomasia, an extended metaphor, a semantic flow, a line break, etc. One of the forms of the chaotic nature as a method of artistic cognition are fractals, represented at the structural level as complex graphic systems. Cognition through linguistic structure is realized both at the lexical (paronomasia, metaphor, oxymoron, paradox) and the grammatical (a line break, violation of grammatical norms, use of graphic symbols and drawings) level. Interaction with the reader is carried out in the course of solving logical riddles represented by paradoxes.
Key words and phrases: художественная когниция, постмодернизм, языковая поэзия, художественный фрактал, теория хаоса, artistic cognition, postmodernism, language poetry, artistic fractal, chaos theory
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
Linnichenko S. I. Struktura, funktsionirovanie i yazykovaya realizatsiya khudozhestvennykh fraktalov v romane Roberta Irvina «Arabskii koshmar» // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2022. T. 15. Vyp. 6.
Malashchuk-Vishnevskaya N. V. Spetsifika absurdistskoi kartiny mira v amerikanskoi poezii postmodernizma // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. № 9-1 (27).
Mandel'brot B. Fraktal'naya geometriya prirody. M.: Institut komp'yuternykh issledovanii, 2002.
Feder E. Fraktaly. M.: Mir, 1991.
Filosofiya poznaniya: vek XXI: kollektivnaya monografiya / pod obshch. red. Z. K. Shaukenovoi. Almaty: IF PR AN MON RK, 2012.
Chernigovskaya T. V. Cheshirskaya ulybka kota Shredingera: yazyk i soznanie. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2013.
Hejinian L. The Language of Inquiry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
McCaffery S. The Politics of the Referent Symposium // Open Letter. 1997. Ser. 3. No. 2.
Perelman B. The Marginalization of Poetry: Language Writing and Literary Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Perloff M. From Language Poetry to the New Concretism: The Evolution of the Avant-Garde // Literature of the Americas. 2022. No. 12.
Silliman R. Language, Realism, Poetry.Introduction // In the American Tree / ed. by R. Silliman. Orono: National Poetry Foundation, 1986.
Watten B. The Turn to Language and the 1960s // Critical Inquiry. 2002. Vol. 29. No. 1.
Wittgenstein L. Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1930-1932: From the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Русский
