Linguistic and Socio-Cultural Features of Hedging in Scientific Discourse (by the Material of Texts of English-Language Scientific Articles on Economics)
Svetaylov Boris Vladimirovich
North-Caucasus Federal University
Submitted: 24.05.2022
Abstract. The aim of this study is to determine the linguistic and socio-cultural features of hedging in the text of an English-language scientific article on economic topics. The paper provides a definitional analysis of the notion "hedging", defines its functions in a scientific text from the position of rhetorical potential and perception of a text by recipients, and notes the pragmatic potential of hedging as an argumentation tool within the framework of scientific discourse. The scientific novelty of the study lies in a comprehensive analysis of hedging markers within the framework of economic articles, both in terms of linguistic and socio-cultural characteristics. As a result, it has been proved that hedging markers are of key importance in the text of a scientific article on economic topics, being an effective method of argumentation, interaction with a reader and obscuration of epistemic responsibility by the author.
Key words and phrases: научный дискурс, социокультурные нормы, хеджи, хеджирование, эпистемическая ответственность, scientific discourse, sociocultural norms, hedges, hedging, epistemic responsibility
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Gribanova T. I. Ritoricheskii potentsial taktiki khedzhirovaniya v angloyazychnom akademicheskom diskurse (na materiale nauchno-tekhnicheskikh issledovatel'skikh statei) // Ritoricheskie traditsii v epokhu tsifrovizatsii: mat. XXIII Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Moskva, 6-8 fevralya 2020 g.). M., 2020.
Zharkynbekova Sh. K., Baibatyrova A. A. Vyrazhenie avtorskoi pozitsii v nauchnykh stat'yakh: metadiskursivnye strategii sozdaniya mezhlichnostnykh otnoshenii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura. 2019. № 2 (16).
Milostivaya A. I., Svetailov B. V. Lingvisticheskie osobennosti angloyazychnoi nauchnoi stat'i po ekonomike // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2019. № 4.
Breivega K., Dahl D., Flottum K. Traces of Self and Others in Research Articles. A Comparative Pilot Study of English, French and Norwegian Research Articles in Medicine, Economics and Linguistics // International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2002. Vol. 12 (2).
Ellis A., Piccione M., Zhang S. Equilibrium Securitization with Diverse Beliefs // Theoretical Economics. 2022. Vol. 17.
Flegg A., Lamonica G. R., Chelli F. M. A New Approach to Modelling the Input-Output Structure of Regional Economies Using Non-Survey Methods // Journal of Economic Structures. 2021. Vol. 12.
Hyland K. Talking to the Academy: Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles // Written Communication. 1996. Vol. 2 (13).
Onuchik P. Informed Intermediaries // Theoretical Economics. 2022. Vol. 17.
Perez A. L. English Academic Writing: Proposal of a Bank of Useful Phrases for Hedging. Las Villas: Universidad Central "Marta Abreu", 2021.
Salager-Meyer F. Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse // English for Specific Purposes. 1994. Vol. 13 (2).
Tran T. Q., Tang T. B. Hedging in the Results and Discussion Section of English Applied Linguistics Research Articles by Vietnamese and Foreign Writers // Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2022. Vol. 1 (13).
Vold E. T. Modalit? ?pist?mique et Discours Scientifique: Th?se Pour le Degr? de Philosophiae Doctor (PhD). Bergen: Universit? de Bergen, 2008.