Interpretative Space of Literary Text as Key Aspect of Content Intimization
Pechenyuk Aleksei Nikolaevich
Stavropol State Pedagogic Institute
Submitted: 12.07.2021
Abstract. The paper aims to reveal linguo-cognitive mechanisms of polylogic interaction of sociocultural and occasional components of interpretative space. Scientific originality of the study involves developing a quadrant model of receptive-interpretative activity taking into account nature of sociocultural information transfer into episodic memory. Common interpretative space as a collective linguo-cognitive phenomenon promotes intellectual-emotive interaction on meaning formation, meaning extension and semantization of meaning components. Variability of sociocultural memory intimization process does not affect nuclear axiological components. Accentuation of sociocultural components as the key ones presupposes reverse influence of episodic memory on common interpretative space.
Key words and phrases: интерпретативное пространство, художественный текст, прецедентный мир, рефлексивная реальность, социокультурная и эпизодическая память, interpretative space, literary text, precedent world, reflexive reality, sociocultural and episodic memory
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Borev Yu. Estetika. M.: Politizdat, 1988. 469 s.
Bredikhin S. N. Konstanty intentsial'nosti, sub"ektivnosti i modal'nosti v germenevticheskom ponimanii smysla // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2015. № 3 (44). S. 54-58.
Bredikhin S. N. Printsipy i usloviya nalichiya i formirovaniya smysla (smysloporozhdayushchie mekhanizmy) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=8484 (data obrashcheniya: 09.07.2021).
Valgina N. S. Teoriya teksta. M.: Logos, 2004. 280 s.
Vygotskii L. S. Psikhologiya iskusstva. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 1998. 480 s.
Zalevskaya A. A. Problemy organizatsii vnutrennego leksikona cheloveka. Kalinin: KGU, 1977. 83 s.
Krotova D. V. Priroda v mirovospriyatii V. Shalamova: retseptsiya klassicheskikh traditsii i poeticheskoe novatorstvo // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 8 (62). Ch. 2. S. 21-25.
Makeeva M. N. Ritorika khudozhestvennogo teksta i ee germenevticheskie posledstviya: diss. … d. filol. n. Tver', 2000. 329 s.
Romanenko E. V. Semioticheskoe prostranstvo massovoi literatury: teoreticheskii aspekt // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 3 (33). Ch. 2. S. 162-167.
Rudnev V. P. Proch' ot real'nosti: issledovaniya po filosofii teksta. M.: Agraf, 2000. 432 s.
Tolstoi A. N. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10-ti t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1986. T. 10. Publitsistika; Rasskazy Ivana Sudareva. 510 s.
Yauss Kh. R. Istoriya literatury kak provokatsiya literaturovedeniya // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1995. № 12. S. 34-84.
Eagleton T. Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, and Reception Theory // Literary Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. R. 47-78.
Русский
