GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2021. № 7. P. 2134-2140.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil210361

Final Particles. Distinction between Final, Modal and Discursive Particles in the German Language
Ivanov Vladimir Dmitrievich
National Research University "MPEI"
Submitted: 16.06.2021
Abstract. The study aims to define final particles as an independent class of words and to identify their specific nature. Scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that the notion of final particles is clarified; it is the first time that specific nature of final particles as a separate class of words with its particular grammatical properties is determined; the paper is the first to consider criteria for distinguishing between final, modal and discursive particles in the German language. It is shown that differences between these groups of words are associated with the position in the sentence structure, intonation, semantic features. It is also the first time that description of semantic, syntactic and functional features of final particles in the dialogue is considered. As a result, it is proved that final particles are a separate class of words displaying particular properties and performing various functions in the course of communication.
Key words and phrases: финальные частицы, дискурсивные частицы, модальные частицы, дискурс, послеполье предложения, final particles, discursive particles, modal particles, discourse, sentence postfield
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Averina A. V. Chastitsy kak elementy kommunikativnogo vzaimodeistviya v nemetskoyazychnoi srede: teoriya i praktika: uchebnoe posobie (magistratura). M.: Prometei, 2021. 196 s.
  2. Averina A. V. Epistemicheskaya modal'nost' kak yazykovoi fenomen (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka). M.: KRASAND, 2010. 192 s.
  3. Dobrovol'skii D. O. Besedy o nemetskom slove. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2013. 752 s.
  4. Nikolaeva T. M. Funktsii chastits v vyskazyvanii (na materiale slavyanskikh yazykov) / otv. red. V. N. Toporov. M.: LIBROKOM, 2013. 170 s.
  5. Aijmer K. Analyzing modal adverbs as modal particles and discourse markers // Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description / ed. by L. Degand, P. Pietrandrea, B. Cornillie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013. P. 89-106.
  6. Aijmer K. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2002. 298 p.
  7. Aijmer K., Foolen A., Simon-Vandenbergen A. M. Pragmatic markers in translation: A methodological proposal // Approaches to Discourse Particles / ed. by K. Fischer. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. P. 101-114.
  8. Coniglio M. Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebens?tzen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2011. 220 S.
  9. DECOW 16 A [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: www.webcorpora.org (data obrashcheniya: 19.06.2021).
  10. DGD [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://dgd.ids-mannheim.de (data obrashcheniya: 19.06.2021).
  11. Diewald G., Fischer K. Zur diskursiven und modalen Funktion der Partikeln aber, auch, doch, und ja in Instruktionsdialogen // Linguistica. 1998. Bd. 38. № 1. S. 75-99.
  12. Duden Bedeutungsw?rterbuch: Wortschatz und Wortbildung: in 12 B?nden. Berlin: Bibliographisches Institut, 2018. Band 10. 1168 S.
  13. Fischer K. Discourse Markers // Pragmatics of Discourse / ed. by A. Barron, K. P. Schneider. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014. P. 271-294.
  14. Fischer K. Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles: Introduction to the volume // Approaches to Discourse Particles / ed. by K. Fischer. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. P. 1-20.
  15. Fraser B. Pragmatic markers // Pragmatics. 1996. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 167-190.
  16. Fraser B. What are discourse markers? // Journal of Pragmatics. 1999. Vol. 31. Issue 7. P. 931-952.
  17. Fried M., ?stman Jan-Ola. Construction Grammar and Spoken Language: The Case of Pragmatic Particles // Journal of Pragmatics. 2005. Vol. 37. Issue 11. P. 1752-1778.
  18. Hancil S. The grammaticalization of final but: From conjunction to final particle // Hancil S., Haselow A., Post M. Final particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. P. 197-220.
  19. Hancil S., Post M., Haselow A. Introduction: Final particles from a typological perspective // Final particles / ed. by S. Hancil, M. Post, A. Haselow. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. P. 3-35.
  20. Haselow A. Final particles in spoken German // Final particles / ed. by S. Hancil, M. Post, A. Haselow. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. P. 77-107.
  21. Heine B., Kaltenb?ck G., Kuteva T. Some observations on the evolution of final particles // Final particles / ed. by S. Hancil, M. Post, A. Haselow. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. P. 111-140.
  22. Helbig G. Lexikon deutscher Partikeln. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklop?die, 1988. 258 S.
  23. Imo W. Wortart Diskursmarker? // Nicht-flektierende Wortarten / hrsg. von B. Rothstein. Berlin - Boston: De Gruyter, Inc., 2012. S. 48-88.
  24. Post M. The North Russian utterance - final particle dak as an information-structuring device // Final particles / ed. by S. Hancil, M. Post, A. Haselow. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. P. 285-304.
  25. Schiffrin D. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 364 p.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru