Aesthetic Function of Alogisms in a Literary Text (by the Material of J. S. Foer’s Short Story "Here We Aren’t, So Quickly")
Shutemova Natalia Valerevna
SPbSU
Submitted: 13.11.2021
Abstract. The research aims to study the functioning of alogisms in a literary text. Based on the material of J. S. Foer’s short story, the paper analyses the variety of types of alogisms used by the author, explains the mechanism of their derivation, identifies their aesthetic function. Scientific novelty of the research lies in considering alogisms in relation to the notion of the essence of a literary text, understood as unity of its typological properties, including notionality, emotiveness, imagery and originality of the literary language form. As a result, it has been proved that alogisms, characterising the author’s thinking, are a means intentionally used in a literary text to represent its notional and emotive basis and system of images, determining the specificity of the writer’s individual style as a whole.
Key words and phrases: алогизм, типологические свойства художественного текста, художественность, эстетическая функция языка, Дж. С. Фоер, alogism, typological properties of a literary text, artisticity, aesthetic function of language, J. S. Foer
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Apresyan Yu. D. Yazykovye anomalii: tipy i funktsii // Res Philologica: filologicheskie issledovaniya. Pamyati akademika Georgiya Vladimirovicha Stepanova (1919-1986) / pod red. D. S. Likhacheva. M. - L.: Nauka, 1990.
Arutyunova N. D. Anomalii i yazyk (k probleme yazykovoi "kartiny mira") // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1987. № 3.
Bakhtin M. M. Raboty 1920-kh godov. Kiev: FIRM "NEXT", 1994.
Kagan M. S. Estetika kak filosofskaya nauka. SPb.: Petropolis, 1997.
Kul'tura russkoi rechi: entsiklopedicheskii slovar'-spravochnik / pod red. L. Yu. Ivanova, A. P. Skovorodnikova, E. N. Shiryaeva. Izd-e 3-e, ster. M.: Flinta, 2011.
Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Protivorechivost' i anomal'nost' teksta: sb. st. / pod red. N. D. Arutyunovoi. M.: Nauka, 1990.
Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2000.
Radbil' T. B. Yazykovye anomalii v khudozhestvennom tekste: avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2006.
Sadovnikov S. A. Alogizm rechi kak khudozhestvennyi priem v tvorchestve A. P. Platonova: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2014.
Slavin'skii Ya. K teorii khudozhestvennogo yazyka / per. s pol'skogo A. K. Zholkovskogo // Strukturalizm "za" i "protiv" / pod red. E. Ya. Basina i M. Ya. Polyakova. M.: Progress, 1975.
Sorokin Yu. A. Perevodovedenie: status perevodchika i psikhogermenevticheskie protsedury. M.: Gnozis, 2003.
Tret'yakova E. A. Anomalii v original'nom i perevodnom khudozhestvennom tekste // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 9. 2012. Vyp. 3.
Shutemova N. V. Refraktsionnaya teoriya khudozhestvennogo perevoda. Perm': Izd-vo Perm. un-ta, 2019.
Engel'gardt B. M. Fenomenologiya i teoriya slovesnosti. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2005.
Yakobson R. O. Raboty po poetike. M.: Progress, 1987.
Foer J. S. Here We Aren’t, So Quickly. 2010. URL: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/06/14/here-we-arent-so-quickly
Horn L. R. Multiple Negation in English and Other Languages // The Expression of Negation / ed. by L. R. Horn. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010.
Jespersen O. The Philosophy of Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.
Marchand H. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. 2nd ed., revised & enlarged. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche Verlag, 1969.
Русский
