Interpretative Component of Argumentative Constructions of Criticism in the English-Language Reviews as Explication of Assessment in Scientific Discourse
Barebina Natal’ya Sergeevna, Tagiev Mikail Ismailovich, Tiguntsev Sergey Alexandrovich
Baikal State University
Irkutsk State Medical University
Submitted: 06.07.2020
Abstract. The article raises the question of studying argumentation from the viewpoint of criticism. The work aims to identify logical, semantic and structural features of the interpretative component in texts of the English-language reviews. Scientific novelty of the study lies in analysing argumentative constructions actualising negative assessment in scientific discourse. The attained results have shown that the interpretative predicate as a part of complex text structures has a reference object "data" in the form of facts and "foundation" in the form of a logical connection. The authors have made conclusions about specificity of expressing criticism in scientific expertise in English from the standpoint of constructive interaction.
Key words and phrases: аргументация, негативное оценивание, критика, англоязычная рецензия, интерпретационный предикат, argumentation, negative assessment, criticism, English-language review, interpretative predicate
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bokmel'der D. A. Obosnovanie razumnykh reshenii. Saarbrucken: LAP, 2014. 294 s.
Vasil'ev L. G. Argumentatsiya i ee ponimanie: logiko-lingvisticheskii podkhod. Kaluga: Kaluzhsk. gos. un-t im. K. E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2014. 331 s.
Vasil'ev L. G., Grineva M. S. Oproverzhenie irratsional'nykh ubezhdenii kak osnovnaya argumentativnaya strategiya terapevticheskogo dialoga // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya "Istoriya i filologiya". 2017. T. 26. № 6. S. 848-851.
Glyzina V. E., Gorskaya N. E., Belousova E. S. Issledovaniya vzaimosvyazi mezhdu svoistvami myshleniya i strukturoi yazyka // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2015. № 10 (105). S. 295-301.
Kostyushkina G. M. Argumentatsiya i kontseptual'naya sistematika rechi i rechevoi deyatel'nosti // Kontseptual'naya sistematika argumentatsii: kollektivnaya monografiya / nauch. red. G. M. Kostyushkina. M.: FLINTA, 2016. S. 10-69.
Larina T. V. Emotivnaya ekologichnost' i emotivnaya vezhlivost' v angliiskoi i russkoi anonimnoi retsenzii // Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2019. № 1 (39). S. 38-57.
Mel'gunova A. G. Yazykovaya reprezentatsiya soprotivleniya kak sposoba kognitivnogo vzaimodeistviya (na primere angliiskikh glagolov) // Izvestiya Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii (Baikal'skii gosudarstvennyi universitet). 2014. № 3. S. 30-35.
Rogoznaya N. N. Istoriya i osnovy yazykoznaniya: uchebnoe posobie. Irkutsk: IRNITU, 2016. 92 s.
Savchuk T. N. Argumentatsiya v diskurse gumanitarnykh nauk (na materiale russko- i belorusskoyazychnykh tekstov): avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. Mn., 2019. 46 s.
Semenova O. F. Argumentiruyushchaya funktsiya paremicheskikh edinits // Problemy kontseptual'noi sistematiki rechi i rechevoi deyatel'nosti: materialy Kh Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGU, 2018. S. 143-148.
Yarygina E. S. Vyrazhenie prichinno-argumentiruyushchikh otnoshenii v khudozhestvennoi i "filologicheskoi proze" Sergeya Dovlatova // Yazyk i aktual'nye problemy obrazovaniya: nauchnye trudy IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii / pod red. E. I. Artamonovoi, O. S. Ushakovoi. M.: IIU MGOU, 2019. S. 196-200.
Yarygina E. S. Sintaksis argumentativnogo diskursa. M.: Yustitsinform, 2018. 198 s.
Apoth?loz D., Brandt P.-Y., Quiroz G. The function of negation in argumentation // Journal of Pragmatics. 1993. № 19. P. 23-38.
Chen S. Review of Discourse and Democracy [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://linguistlist.org/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=36020537 (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2020).
Eemeren F. H. van. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragmadialectical Theory of Argumentation // Argumentation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. 308 p.
Hu J. Review of A Synchronic and Diachronic Study of the Grammar of the Chinese Xiang Dialects [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://linguistlist.org/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=66387 (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2020).
Koppe S. Review of Local Literacies: Theory and Practice [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://linguistlist.org/ pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=3696 (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2020).
Morgan M. V. Review of Focus Strategies in African Languages [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://linguistlist.org/ pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=196228 (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2020).
Quiroz G., Apotheloz D., Brandt P.-Y. How counter-argumentation works // Argumentation Illuminated / ed. by F. H. van Eemeren et al. Amsterdam: SICSAT, 1992. P. 172-177.
Romanova E. Review of Syntax and Spell-Out in Slavic [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://linguistlist.org/ pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=36413817 (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2020).
Toulmin S. E. The Uses of Argument. L. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 247 p.
Русский
