GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2020. № 11. P. 262-267.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.11.55

Basic Characteristics of Review as Academic Discourse Genre (by the Material of Reviews on Theses and Author’s Abstracts)

Petrenko Yulya Andreevna
Kuban State University


Submitted: 14.08.2020
Abstract. The research objective includes identifying genre-formative features of review as a special type of secondary academic text. Scientific originality of the paper lies in the fact that the researcher reveals constitutive features of the review genre by the material of reviews on theses and author’s abstracts, which allows highlighting peculiarities of this academic discourse genre. The findings indicate that a review text has a two-level structure and includes the following components: research summary and review of research material. Evaluation representation in a review text is determined by institutional discourse parameters, and evaluative means are most clearly represented at lexical and syntactic levels.
Key words and phrases: академический дискурс, жанр "отзыв", категория оценки, типы оценки, academic discourse, review genre, evaluation category, types of evaluation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Anisimova T. V. O printsipakh klassifikatsii ritoricheskikh zhanrov // Rechevoe obshchenie: spetsializirovannyi vestnik. 2000. Vyp. 2 (10). S. 42-48.
  2. Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenii. Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt. M.: Nauka, 1988. 338 s.
  3. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1999. 896 s.
  4. Bagirokov Kh. Z. Otzyv o dissertatsii O. N. Logutenkovoi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.kubsu.ru/sites/ default/files/dis/opp/otzyv_opponenta_logutenkovoy_bagirokov_h.z.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 11.06.2020).
  5. Boiko S. S. Otzyv na avtoreferat dissertatsii D. S. Yarovenko [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.philol. msu.ru/~ref/2015/2015_YarovenkoDS_otzyv_ref_avt-BojkoSS.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2020).
  6. Vezhbitskaya A. Rechevye zhanry (v svete teorii elementarnykh smyslovykh edinits) // Antologiya rechevykh zhanrov: povsednevnaya kommunikatsiya: monogr. izd-e. M.: Labirint, 2007. S. 68-80.
  7. Katermina V. V. Otzyv o dissertatsii V. Yu. Korotun [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.kubsu.ru/sites/ default/files/dis/supervisor/otzyv_nauchnogo_rukovoditelya_korotun.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.06.2020).
  8. Kozlov A. Otzyv na avtoreferat dissertatsii D. N. Evgen'eva [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://ens.mil.ru/files/ morf/military/files/evg_med.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2020).
  9. Kolshanskii G. V. Sootnoshenie sub"ektivnykh i ob"ektivnykh faktorov v yazyke. M.: KomKniga, 2005. 229 s.
  10. Levontina I. B. Otzyv na avtoreferat dissertatsii G. D. Zolinoi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.science. vsu.ru/dissertations/1607/Otzyv_Levontina I.B._Zolina_G.D.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2020).
  11. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Azbukovnik, 2000. 940 s.
  12. Ostankovich A. V. Otzyv o dissertatsii M. M. Meretukovoi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.kubsu.ru/sites/ default/files/dis/opp/otzyv_ostankovicha.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 11.06.2020).
  13. Ponomarenko I. N. Otzyv o dissertatsii V. A. Kryzhanovskoi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.kubsu.ru/ sites/default/files/dis/supervisor/otzyv_nauchnogo_rukovoditelya_i.n._ponomarenko.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2020).
  14. Ryadchikova E. N. Otzyv o dissertatsii M. M. Loginovoi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.kubsu.ru/ sites/default/files/dis/supervisor/otzyv_nauch.ruk_ryadchikovoy_e.n.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.06.2020).
  15. Savel'ev K. N. Otzyv o dissertatsii M. M. Meretukovoi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.kubsu.ru/sites/ default/files/dis/opp/otzyv_saveleva.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2020).
  16. Serio P. Analiz diskursa vo Frantsuzskoi shkole // Semiotika: antologiya / sost. Yu. S. Stepanov. M.: Delovaya kniga, 2001. S. 549-562.
  17. Teliya V. N. Konnotativnyi aspekt semantiki nominativnykh edinits. M.: Nauka, 1986. 143 s.
  18. Fedotova T. V. Otzyv o dissertatsii V. A. Kryzhanovskoi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.kubsu.ru/sites/ default/files/dis/opp/otzyv_opponenta_fedotovoy_t.v.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2020).
  19. Yagubova M. A. Leksiko-semanticheskoe pole "Otsenka" v russkoi razgovornoi rechi: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Saratov, 1992. 21 s.
  20. Hyland K. Academic Discourse. L. - N. Y.: Continuum, 2009. 215 p.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru