Semantics of Postpositional Constructions with the Postposition ‘Бел?н’ in the Tatar Language: Corpus Analysis
Galieva Alfiya Makarimovna, Gatiatullin Ayrat Rafizovich
Tatarstan Academy of Sciences
Submitted: 17.06.2020
Abstract. "Noun + postposition" phrases (postpositional cases) are an essential element of the Turkic grammatical system. The paper aims to identify and classify the Tatar postpositional constructions with the postposition ‘бел?н’. Scientific originality of the study lies in the fact that for the first time in the Tatar linguistics, the authors present the most comprehensive description of the Tatar postpositional constructions with the postposition ‘бел?н’. Relying on the conducted analysis, the researchers identify the following casal meanings: comitative, instrumental, objective and adverbial. The subjective meaning is considered peripheral due to substantial lexico-grammatical restrictions. The authors show that the semantic meaning of the Tatar postpositional constructions with the postposition ‘бел?н’ is determined by semantic meanings of the governing predicate and adjacent nouns.
Key words and phrases: татарский язык, послелог, комитатив, аналитический падеж, семантика, Tatar language, postposition, comitative, analytical case, semantics
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Arkhipov A. V. Tipologiya komitativnykh konstruktsii: diss.. k. filol. n. M., 2005. 191 s.
Ganiev F. A. O sinteticheskikh i analiticheskikh padezhakh tatarskogo yazyka // Voprosy tyurkologii / otv. red. M. Z. Zakiev. Kazan': KGPI, 1970. S. 74-84.
Grammatika sovremennogo yakutskogo literaturnogo yazyka: fonetika i morfologiya / red. E. I. Ubryatova i dr. M.: Nauka, 1982. 496 s.
Guzev V. G. Teoreticheskaya grammatika turetskogo yazyka. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta, 2015. 320 s.
Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / gl. red. V. N. Yartseva. M.: Bol'shaya Rossiiskaya entsiklopediya, 2002. 709 s.
Plungyan V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira. M.: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, 2011. 672 s.
Plungyan V. A. Obshchaya morfologiya: vvedenie v problematiku. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003. 384 s.
Russkaya grammatika: v 2-kh t. / gl. red. N. Yu. Shvedova. M.: Nauka, 1980. T. 1. 788 s.
Suleimanov D. Sh., Gatiatullin A. R. Sistema semanticheskikh universalii i ikh realizatsiya v vide relyatsionno-situatsionnogo freima // Kognitivno-semioticheskie aspekty modelirovaniya v gumanitarnoi sfere / pod red. V. L. Stefanyuka, E. A. Taisinoi. Kazan': Izd-vo Akademii nauk RT, 2017. S. 185-210.
Tatar grammatikasy: ?ch tomda / proekt ?it. M. Z. Z?kiev. Kazan: T??SI, 2016. T. II. 432 b.
Shcherbak A. M. Ocherki po sravnitel'noi morfologii tyurkskikh yazykov (imya). L.: Nauka, 1977. 190 s.
Yakhontov S. E. Klassy glagolov i padezhnoe oformlenie aktantov // Problemy teorii grammaticheskogo zaloga / otv. red. A. A. Kholodovich. L.: Nauka, 1978. S. 102-108.
Erdal M. A. Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill, 2004. 575 p.
Galieva A., Nevzorova O. Semantic Annotation of Verbs for the Tatar Corpus // Proceedings of the XVII EURALEX International Congress: Lexicography and Linguistic Diversity (6-10 September, 2016). Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, 2016. P. 340-347.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980. 276 p.
Stolz T., Stroh C., Urdze A. Comitatives and Instrumentals [Elektronnyi resurs] // The World Atlas of Language Structures Online / ed. by M. S. Dryer, M. Haspelmath. URL: http://wals.info/chapter/52 (data obrashcheniya: 15.06.2020).
Русский
