"HOMO SOMATICUS" AND "TRANSMUTED FORM" IN BESTIARY TRADITION OF THE MODERN RUSSIAN LITERATURE
Garipova Gul'chira Talgatovna
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Submitted: 05.06.2019
Abstract. The article analyses the problem of artistic aestheticization of lycanthropic models and "homo somaticus" codes in the modern Russian literature. The author considers variable components of the artistic opposition "human being - animal" as a basis of artistic lycanthropic binarism, identifies the dynamics of modelling the existing bestiary neo-myths of "corporeal existence" in correlation with lycanthropic anamorphoses and metamorphoses. The paper focuses on analysing the specificity of modern representation of "homo somaticus" lycanthropic models in the domestic literary tradition through the lenses of existential and mythological phenomenology of "transmuted form".
Key words and phrases: А. Ким, В. Пелевин, Д. Липскеров, homo somaticus, оборотничество, бестиарий, метаморфоза, неомиф, тело-трансформ, симулякр, A. Kim, V. Pelevin, D. Lipskerov, homo somaticus, lycanthropy, bestiary, metamorphosis, neo-myth, body-transform, simulacrum
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Berdyaev N. A. Metafizika pola i lyubvi // Russkii eros, ili Filosofiya lyubvi v Rossii: sbornik / sost. i avt. vstup. st. V. P. Shestakov. M.: Progress, 1991. S. 232-266.
Berezina A. G. German Gesse. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1976. 128 s.
Bibler V. S. Nravstvennost'. Kul'tura. Sovremennost' (filosofskie razdum'ya o zhiznennykh problemakh) // Eticheskaya mysl': nauchno-publitsisticheskie chteniya / otv. red. A. A. Guseinov. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S. 16-57.
Bugoslavskaya O. V. Postmodernistskii roman: printsipy literaturovedcheskoi interpretatsii ("Roman" V. Sorokina i "Poslednii son razuma" D. Lipskerova): avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. M., 2001. 28 s.
Zamanskaya V. V. Ekzistentsial'naya traditsiya v russkoi literature KhKh veka: dialogi na granitsakh stoletii: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2002. 304 s.
Zapadnoe literaturovedenie XX veka: entsiklopediya. M.: Intrada, 2004. 560 s.
Zlydneva N. V. Insektnyi kod i absurd v avangarde [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://culture.wikireading.ru/70131 (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2019).
Kas'yanova A. V. Obraz volka v romane V. Pelevina "Svyashchennaya kniga oborotnya" // Novyi filologicheskii vestnik. 2008. № 2 (7). S. 69-74.
Kim A. A. Belka: roman-skazka. M.: Sov. pisatel', 1984. 272 s.
Mamardashvili M. K. Prevrashchenie formy [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://metodolog.ru/00559/00559.html (data obrashcheniya: 23.03.2019).
Makhrova G. A. Khudozhestvennoe svoeobrazie romannoi prozy D. Lipskerova 1990-kh - nachala 2000-kh gg.: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. N. Novgorod, 2014. 22 s.
Os'mukhina O. Yu., Siprova A. A. Mifopoeticheskii kontekst romana v. pelevina "Svyashchennaya kniga oborotnya" // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. № 11 (77). Ch. 2. S. 26-30.
Pelevin V. O. Svyashchennaya kniga oborotnya [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.ndolya.ru/zhslovo/klassika/ ?r=psko&id=6 (data obrashcheniya: 23.03.2019).
Satprem. Shri Aurobindo, ili Puteshestvie soznaniya. Bishkek: Globus, 2002. 240 s.
Chesnov Ya. V. Telesnost' cheloveka: filosofsko-antropologicheskoe ponimanie. M.: IF RAN, 2007. 213 s.
Русский
