PHYTONYMS AS LEXICAL TIMERS IN TEXTUAL LANDSCAPE COGNITIVE ATTRACTOR’S ARCHITECTONICS
Ogneva Elena Anatol'evna, Buzina Evgeniya Igorevna
Belgorod State National Research University
Submitted: 05.04.2019
Abstract. The article describes the artistic concepts NEW ZEALAND and AUSTRALIA including the synergistic sub-concepts LANDSCAPE, TIME, society in the architectonics of the novel "The Thorn Birds" by C. McCullough. The authors suggest a textual landscape cognitive attractor’s taxonomic model, the architectonics of which includes phytonyms as lexical timers. The originality of the research involves the development of the authors’ algorithm to study a textual landscape cognitive attractor including a phytonymic segment as the integrity of textual lexical timers.
Key words and phrases: художественный текст, архитектоника, текстовый пейзажный когнитивный аттрактор, фитоним, лексический таймер, fiction text, architectonics, textual landscape cognitive attractor, phytonym, lexical timer
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Averintsev S. S. Simvol // Kratkaya literaturnaya entsiklopediya: v 9-ti t. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1972. T. 7.
Bakhtin M. M. K metodologii gumanitarnykh nauk // Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. S. 361-373.
Buzina E. I. Chastotnost' temporal'nykh markerov v arkhitektonike kontseptosfery romana "Jane Eyre" Sh. Bronte // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Filologiya". 2017. № 4. S. 115-119.
Gal'perin I. R. Tekst kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya. Izd-e 5-e, stereotip. M.: Nauka, 2007. 139 s.
Glamazda S. N. Sinergiya proksemnoi i sotsiumnoi kontekstnoi polyarizatsii v tekstovoi modeli mira (na materiale romana G. Dzheimsa "The Europeans") // Filologicheskii aspekt. 2019. № 2 (46). S. 68-75.
Danilenko I. A. Rol' peizazhnykh edinits v nominativnom pole dual'nogo kontsepta "lyubov' i odinochestvo" (na materiale romana F. S. Fitsdzheral'da "The Great Gatsby" / "Velikii Getsbi") // Nauchnyi rezul'tat. 2016. T. 2. № 4. S. 3-8.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovaya matritsa kul'tury. M.: Gnozis, 2013. 320 s.
Kukharenko V. A. Interpretatsiya teksta: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov ped. in-tov. Izd-e 2-e, pererab. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1988. 192 s.
Kushneruk S. L. Teoriya tekstovykh mirov kak issledovatel'skaya programma v ramkakh kognitivnoi lingvistiki // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2011. № 1. S. 45-51.
Levina V. N. Kontseptualizatsiya peizazha v khudozhestvennom tekste // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2009. Vyp. IV. S. 398-413.
Lotman Yu. M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta. M.: Azbuka, 2015. 704 s.
Ogneva E. A. Kontseptsiya tekstovoi kognitivnoi attraktsii // Lingvisticheskie gorizonty / otv. red. E. A. Ogneva, I. B. Akinshina. Belgorod: Epitsentr, 2018. Vyp VI. S. 87-92.
Ogneva E. A. Strukturirovanie kontseptosfery khudozhestvennogo teksta // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2013. Vyp. XIII. S. 614-625.
Florenskii P. A. Analiz prostranstvennosti v khudozhestvenno-izobrazitel'nykh proizvedeniyakh [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://philologos.narod.ru/florensky/fl_space.htm (data obrashcheniya: 02.09.2018).
Borkowski J. What Is the Cultural Context of a Literary Text? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.jltonline.de/ index.php/reviews/article/view/631/1540http://www.jltonline.de/index.php/reviews/article/view/631/1540 (data obrashcheniya: 02.04.2018).
Lakoff G. The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics. N. Y.: Penguin Books, 2009. 320 r.
McCullough C. The Thorn Birds. L.: Avon, 1978. 704 p.
Panasenko N. Where, Why and How? Topophones in Ray Bradbury’s Science Fiction // Lege artis: Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 2018. № 3 (1). R. 223-273.
Русский
