PROPOSITIONAL APPROACH TO ANALYSING DENOTATIVE STRUCTURE OF SECONDARY TEXTS (BY THE MATERIAL OF RENDERINGS OF I. A. BUNIN’S SHORT STORY "THE HUNCHBACK’S AFFAIR")
Simonenko Marina Aleksandrovna, Bagrintseva Ol'ga Borisovna
Astrakhan State University
Submitted: 25.01.2019
Abstract. The article substantiates the relevance of the propositional approach to analysing the denotative structure of secondary texts as products of a reader’s interpretational activity. Stage-by-stage organization of the study has allowed the authors to identify the denotations of the original and secondary texts and to discover inter-denotational relations. The research findings are as follows: the authors have developed propositional models of the original and secondary texts, modelled global propositions, concluded on the propositional content of secondary texts and identified possible causes of errors when interpreting the main event of a text.
Key words and phrases: денотат, денотативная структура, вторичный текст, пропозиция, пропозициональная модель, интерпретация текста, denotatum, denotative structure, secondary text, proposition, propositional model, text interpretation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Alefirenko N. F. Spornye problemy semantiki: monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2005. 326 s.
Akhutina T. V. Smysl, smyslovoe pole i model' situatsii teksta // Psikholіngvіstika. Psikholingvistika. Psycholinguistics. Seriya "Psikhologiya". 2016. Vip. 20 (1). S. 15-26.
Babenko L. G., Kazarin Yu. V. Lingvisticheskii analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta. Teoriya i praktika: uchebnik, praktikum. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2005. 496 s.
Bunin I. A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 9-ti t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1966. T. 5. Povesti i rasskazy 1917-1930 godov. 543 s.
Deik T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya: sbornik rabot. M.: Progress, 1989. 310 s.
Zemskaya Yu. N., Kachesova I. Yu., Komissarova L. M., Panchenko N. V., Chuvakin A. A. Teoriya teksta: ucheb. posobie. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2010. 132 s.
Novikov A. I. Semantika teksta i ee formalizatsiya. M.: Nauka, 1983. 216 s.
Petrov S. V. Vzaimodeistvie raznourovnevykh komponentov denotativnoi struktury khudozhestvennogo teksta: na materiale romana Yu. K. Oleshi "Zavist'": diss. … k. filol. n. SPb., 2009. 184 s.
Sakharnyi L. V. Teksty-primitivy i zakonomernosti ikh porozhdeniya // Kubryakova E. S., Shakhnarovich A. M., Sakharnyi L. V. Chelovecheskii faktor v yazyke: yazyk i porozhdenie rechi. M.: Nauka, 1991. C. 221-236.
Uspenskii B. A. Ego Loquens. Yazyk i kommunikatsionnoe prostranstvo. M.: RGGU, 2007. 320 s.
Shabes V. Ya. Sobytie i tekst. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1989. 175 s.
Shmeleva T. V. Predlozhenie i situatsiya v sintaksicheskoi kontseptsii T. P. Lomteva // Filologicheskie nauki. 1983. № 3. S. 42-48.
Chow H. M., Mar R. A., Xu Y., Liu S., Wagage S., Braun A. R. Personal experience with narrated events modulates functional connectivity within visual and motor systems during story comprehension // Human Brain Mapping. 2015. Vol. 36. P. 1494-1505.
Nijhof A. D., Willems R. M. Simulating Fiction: Individual Differences in Literature Comprehension Revealed with fMRI // PLoS ONE. 2015. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 1-17.
Русский
