GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2019. № 12. P. 118-121.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.12.25

RECEPTIVE-INTERPRETATIVE SPACE OF LITERARY TEXT: PROBLEMATIC PARADIGM

Kuznetsova Anna Vladimirovna
Southern Federal University


Submitted: 29.10.2019
Abstract. The article considers the basic problems of reception and interpretation of literary text within the classical scientific paradigm. The paper aims to identify the main factors influencing artistic reception and multi-variant interpretation of literary text. Artistic reception is simultaneously a final stage of artistic communication and its starting point in the context of the recipient’s motivation for interpretative activity. The ontological status of literary text is conditioned not only by the author’s intention but in many ways by the recipient’s ability, readiness for interaction with the author.
Key words and phrases: рецептивно-интерпретативное пространство, художественный текст, художественная коммуникация, интенциональность, реципиент, оценка, receptive-interpretative space, literary text, artistic communication, intentionality, recipient, assessment
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Anisimova E. E. Retseptsiya russkoi literaturnoi klassiki na rubezhe XIX-XX vekov: k postanovke problemy // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2018. № 6 (84). Ch. 2. S. 230-233.
  2. Borev Yu. Estetika. M.: Politizdat, 1988. 469 s.
  3. Valgina N. S. Teoriya teksta: ucheb. posobie. M.: Logos, 2004. 280 s.
  4. Ingarden R. Issledovaniya po estetike. M.: Izd-vo inostr. lit-ry, 1962. 552 s.
  5. Krotova D. V. Priroda v mirovospriyatii V. Shalamova: retseptsiya klassicheskikh traditsii i poeticheskoe novatorstvo // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. № 8 (62). Ch. 2. S. 21-25.
  6. Lermontov M. Yu. Geroi nashego vremeni. Predislovie // Lermontov M. Yu. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4-kh t. M.: GIKhL, 1958. T. 4. Proza. Pis'ma. S. 7-8.
  7. Makeeva M. N. Ritorika khudozhestvennogo teksta i ee germenevticheskie posledstviya: avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. Krasnodar, 2000. 37 s.
  8. Rozanov I. N. Literaturnye reputatsii. Raboty raznykh let. M.: Sov. pisatel', 1990. 464 s.
  9. Romanenko E. V. Semioticheskoe prostranstvo massovoi literatury: teoreticheskii aspekt // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 3 (33). Ch. 2. S. 162-167.
  10. Rudnev V. P. Proch' ot real'nosti: issledovaniya po filosofii teksta. M.: Agraf, 2000. 432 s.
  11. Yauss Kh. R. Istoriya literatury kak provokatsiya literaturovedeniya / per. s nem. i predisl. I. Zorkoi // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1995. № 12. S. 34-84.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru