GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 9. Part 2. P. 304-310.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-9-2.20

ELEGY GENRE IN THE RUSSIAN AND TATAR LITERATURES: COMPARATIVE ASPECT
Khabibullina Alsu Zarifovna
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Submitted: 27.06.2018
Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of elegy in the Russian literature of the XIX century and in the Tatar poetry of the beginning of the XX century in the comparative aspect. Its goal is to clarify the essence of the correlation between the Russian elegy and elegiac tone with certain genres of the Tatar poetry: ghazal, kit?a. The poems by A. Pushkin ("The Daylight Faded"), N. Nekrasov ("The Last Elegies"), ?. Tuqay ("Broken Hope", "Without the Title") are the factual material of the research. It is ascertained that ?. Tuqay’s poetry became the expression sphere of the dialogue between the literatures: his ghazal "Broken Hope", as well as other poems, conveys the artistic content that correlates with the elegiac tone of the Russian poetry of the XIX century. The author of the article proves that thanks to the translations into the Tatar language of A. Pushkin’s and M. Lermontov’s elegies, ?. Tuqay managed to create in his works those images and themes that are close to the studied genre and its modality.
Key words and phrases: элегия, газель, русская литература, татарская литература, диалог, сопоставительная поэтика, elegy, ghazal, Russian literature, Tatar literature, dialogue, comparative poetics
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Amineva V. R. Gabdulla Tukai i russkaya literatura XX v.: tipologicheskie paralleli. Kazan': Tatarskoe kn. izd-vo, 2016. 160 s.
  2. Vatsuro V. E. Lirika pushkinskoi pory. SPb.: Nauka, 1994. 240 s.
  3. Vorozheikina Z. N. Kyt’a - stikhotvorenie-fragment v persidskoi poeticheskoi kul'ture // Neizmennost' i novizna khudozhestvennogo mira: pamyati E. E. Bertel'sa: sb. statei / sost. N. V. Kolesnikova. M.: Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, 1999. S. 36-58.
  4. Galieva A. M., Nagumanova E. F. Osobennosti peredachi natsional'no spetsificheskikh kontseptov v perevodnykh tekstakh (na primere kontsepta Mo?) // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2013. T. 155. Kn. 2. S. 245-251.
  5. Gasparov M. L. Elegiya // Literaturnyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / pod red. V. M. Kozhevnikova, P. A. Nikolaeva. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1987.
  6. Ermolenko S. I. "Elegii" M. Yu. Lermontova: zhanrovyi kanon i tvorcheskaya individual'nost' // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2014. № 2 (2). S. 155-161.
  7. Zakirova R. R. Kontsept "Mo?" v tatarskoi yazykovoi kartine mira: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Kazan', 2008. 23 s.
  8. Zyryanov O. V. Zhanrovaya model' elegii i elegicheskii modus khudozhestvennosti // Zyryanov O. V. Evolyutsiya zhanrovogo soznaniya russkoi liriki: fenomenologicheskii aspekt. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo un-ta, 2003. S. 101-123.
  9. Ibragimov M. I. Identichnost' v literature (na materiale tatarskoi poezii XX veka) // Filologiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 1 (31). S. 151-154.
  10. Kozlov V. I. Russkaya elegiya nekanonicheskogo perioda. Ocherki tipologii i istorii. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2013. 280 s.
  11. Kurbatov Kh. Ritmika tatarskogo stikha / Tatar shigyir' ritmikasy. Kazan': Institut yazyka, literatury i istorii im. G. Ibragimova, 2005. 89 s.
  12. Lotman Yu. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta. SPb.: Azbuka; Azbuka-Attikus, 2016. 704 s.
  13. Nekrasov N. A. Poslednie elegii // Russkaya elegiya XVIII - nachala XX veka / sost. L. G. Frizman. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1991. S. 454-459.
  14. Nigmatullina Yu. G. Tipy kul'tur i tsivilizatsii v istoricheskom razvitii tatarskoi i russkoi literatur. Kazan': Fen, 1997. 191 s.
  15. Pushkin A. S. Sochineniya: v 3-kh t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1955. T. 1. Stikhotvoreniya. Skazki. Ruslan i Lyudmila: poema. 735 s.
  16. Rakhim G. Izbrannye proizvedeniya / sost. M. I. Ibragimov, A. M. Gainetdinov. Kazan': Ikhlas, 2018. 560 s.
  17. Tamimdari A. Istoriya persidskoi literatury. SPb.: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, 2007. 240 s.
  18. Tukai G. Izbrannoe. Kazan': Tatarskoe kn. izd-vo, 1978. 272 s.
  19. Tukai G. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 2-kh t. Kazan': Tatarskoe kn. izd-vo, 2006. T. 1. 271 s.
  20. Tukai G. Proizvedeniya: v 6-ti t. Kazan': Tatarskoe kn. izd-vo, 2011. T. 2. 480 s.
  21. Frizman L. G. Zhizn' liricheskogo zhanra. Russkaya elegiya ot Sumarokova do Nekrasova. M.: Nauka, 1973. 167 s.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru