PECULIARITY OF ARGUMENT IN PERSUASION STRATEGY (BY THE MATERIAL OF RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE STATEMENTS OF THE FORMER AMBASSADOR OF LITHUANIA IN UKRAINE PETRAS VAITIEK?NAS)
Prokhorova Anastasiya Evgen'evna
Military University of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
Submitted: 13.03.2018
Abstract. The article is devoted to the topical problem of the authorities’ influence on the consciousness of the audience by means of various speech strategies differing in prognostic, probabilistic nature. The objective of the paper is to determine the hierarchically structured complex strategy of persuasion implemented both through manipulative and persuasive impact technologies, which makes it possible to distinguish them. Also the paper aims at highlighting the tactics of double argument in the context of the persuasive impact analysis by the example of statements on annexation of Crimea by Russia by the former Lithuanian ambassador in Ukraine Petras Vaitiek?nas.
Key words and phrases: политический дискурс, речевое воздействие, манипулятивное воздействие, убеждающее воздействие, речевая стратегия, стратегия убеждения, аргументация, аргументативная тактика, тактика двойной аргументации, political discourse, speech impact, manipulative impact, persuasive impact, speech strategy, strategy of persuasion, argumentation, argumentative tactics, tactics of double argument
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyi podkhod): diss. … k. filol. n. M.: Institut russkogo yazyka AN SSSR, 1990. 378 s.
Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i praktika: uch. posobie. Izd-e 6-e. M.: FLINTA; Nauka, 2018. 592 s.
Gavenko S. V. Analiz argumentativnogo effekta otsenochnoi semantiki v estestvennom yazyke (na materiale amerikanskikh tekstov) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digest/2001/articles/gavenko/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.03.2018).
Ivanova Yu. M. Strategii rechevogo vozdeistviya v zhanre predvybornykh teledebatov [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/strategii-rechevogo-vozdeistviya-v-zhanre-predvybornykh-teledebatov (data obrashcheniya: 13.03.2018).
Issers O. S. Rechevoe vozdeistvie: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nosti "Svyazi s obshchestvennost'yu". M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2009. 224 s.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 385 s.
Krylova O. A., Remchukova E. N., Trofimova G. N., Issers O. S. Sovremennye problemy filologii [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://doc.knigi-x.ru/22filologiya/175136-1-oa-krilova-remchukova-trofimova-issers-sovremennie-problemi-filologii-uchebnoe-posobie-moskva.php (data obrashcheniya: 13.03.2018).
Kunitsyna E. Yu. Otsenka i tsennosti v strukture argumentatsii // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Seriya "Lingvistika". 2005. № 9. S. 92-108.
Litovskii diplomat: beskrovnaya sdacha Kryma - uspekh i spasenie Ukrainy [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://eadaily. com/ru/news/2018/02/24/litovskiy-diplomat-beskrovnaya-sdacha-kryma-uspeh-i-spasenie-ukrainy?utm_source=smi2&utm_ term=3772eb45-d318-4471-93c1-930509ff7759&utm_content=86206 (data obrashcheniya: 23.03.2018).
Parshina O. N. Strategii i taktiki rechevogo povedeniya sovremennoi politicheskoi elity Rossii: diss. … d. filol. n. Saratov: SGU im. N. G. Chernyshevskogo, 2005. 325 s.
Filicheva O. S. Strategiya argumentatsii i sposoby ee realizatsii v nauchnom diskurse // The Way of Science: international scientific journal. 2015. № 1 (11). S. 110-112.
Lewinski M. Argumentative Discussion: The Rationality of What? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.academia. edu/20220592/Argumentative_Discussion_The_Rationality_of_What (data obrashcheniya: 13.03.2018).
Русский
