GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 4. Part 1. P. 37-40.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-4-1.8

THE PECULIARITIES OF SYMBOLIZATION IN THE TATAR POETRY OF THE XX CENTURY

Yusupova Nurfiya Marsovna
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University


Submitted: 17.01.2018
Abstract. The article reveals and analyzes the key features of the symbolization in the Tatar poetry of the XX century. The paper considers conditions and forms of symbolization typical of the national culture, correlated with the creative attitudes and principles of this or that artist; stable symbols are identified at each stage of verbal art, their semantic and functional field is defined. Literary-aesthetic, social-philosophical and culturological factors are determined as the dominant prerequisites. The purpose of the article is to identify the features and conditions of the symbolization in the Tatar poetry of the XX century.
Key words and phrases: татарская поэзия, символизация, символ, функция, поэтическая особенность, литературный процесс, Tatar poetry, symbolization, symbol, function, poetic feature, literary process
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Antonov V. I. Simvol v obshchestve i kul'ture Vostoka. M.: Luch, 1993. 53 s.
  2. Golubkov M. M. Russkaya literatura KhKh veka: posle raskola. M.: Aspekt Press, 2001. 267 s.
  3. Gyunter Kh. Arkhetipy sovetskoi kul'tury // Sotsrealisticheskii kanon: sb. statei pod obshch. red. Kh. Gyuntera i E. Dobrenko. SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000. S. 743-785.
  4. Za?idullina D. F. 1960-80 ellar tatar ?d?biyaty: ya?arysh m?idannary ??m avangard ezl?n?l?r. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 2015. 383 b.
  5. Za?idullina D. F., Iosypova N. M. KhKh gasyr tatar ?d?biyaty tarikhy: d?reslek: 2 tomda. Kazan: Kazan universitety, 2011. T. 2. KhKh i?zne? ikenche yartysynda tatar ?d?biyaty. 198 b.
  6. Kolobaeva L. A. Simvol kak khranitel' i vozmutitel' klassicheskikh traditsii (obraz Don-Zhuana v russkoi literature kontsa XIX - nachala XX veka) // Klassika i sovremennost' / pod red. P. A. Nikolaeva, V. E. Khalizeva. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1991. S. 207-216.
  7. Leiderman N. L., Lipovetskii M. N. Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: uchebnoe posobie: v 3-kh kn. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. Kn. 1. Literatura "ottepeli" (1953-1968). 284 s.
  8. Nigmatullina Yu. G. Tipy kul'tur i tsivilizatsii v istoricheskom razvitii tatarskoi i russkoi literatur. Kazan': Fen, 1997. 192 s.
  9. Yusupova N. M. Ideologicheskie obrazy kak obraz-simvol v tatarskoi poezii 1920-1930-kh godov // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. № 5 (71): v 3-kh ch. Ch. 2. C. 44-46.
  10. Yusupova N. M. Simvolizatsiya v tatarskoi poezii nachala KhKh veka // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya "Istoriya i filologiya". 2014. № 4. S. 111-114.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru