GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 11. Part 1. P. 176-180.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-11-1.37

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREPOSITIONAL AND POSTPOSITIONAL CONSTRUCTIONS AS THE MEANS TO EXPRESS SPATIAL RELATIONS

Usmanov Rinat Shamilevich, Kanafina Aizilya Rasulevna
Bashkir State University


Submitted: 28.06.2018
Abstract. The article analyses and summarizes certain scientific approaches to studying the means of expressing spatial relations; the authors briefly describe the results of the comparative analysis of the mentioned means. The accent is made on the semantic fullness of prepositions and postpositions in the Bashkir, Russian and English languages. Each preposition and postposition has its own lexical meaning. Spatial prepositions and postpositions, along with temporal ones, are the most frequent in the English and Bashkir languages; this corresponds to the provisions on the categories of space and time.
Key words and phrases: параметрические прилагательные, норма, форма объекта, несимметричность, сочетаемость, топологический тип, parametric adjectives, norm, form of object, asymmetry, compatibility, topological type
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Butorin S. S. Kompozitsionnyi kharakter prostranstvennoi semantiki seriinykh poslelogov v ketskom yazyke // Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri. 2007. № 4. S. 40-44.
  2. Varlamov M. V., Varlamova M. P. Topologicheskie modeli prototipicheskoi semantiki angliiskikh predlogov // Yazyk. Slovesnost'. Kul'tura. 2011. № 2. S. 38-48.
  3. Zainullin M. V. Sovremennyi bashkirskii literaturnyi yazyk. Morfologiya. Ufa: Kitap, 2005. 391 s.
  4. Kobozeva I. M. Grammatika opisaniya prostranstva // Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Yazyki prostranstv: sbornik statei / otv. red. N. D. Arutyunova, I. B. Levontina. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 2000. S. 152-162.
  5. Kubryakova E. S. Semantika v kognitivnoi lingvistike (o kontsepte konteinera i formakh ego ob"ektivizatsii v yazyke) // Izvestiya Akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 1999. T. 58. № 5-6. S. 3-12.
  6. Nikolaenko A. V. Kognitivnyi podkhod v izuchenii semantiki prostranstvennykh i vremennykh predlogov (frantsuzskii yazyk) // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2013. № 670. S. 128-146.
  7. Nikolova A. Funktsional'naya grammatika: vyrazhenie prostranstvennykh otnoshenii v russkom yazyke (na fone bolgarskogo). Shumen: Universitetsko izdatelstvo "Episkop Konstantin Preslavski", 1997. 163 s.
  8. Pete I. Tipy sintaksicheskoi modal'nosti v russkom yazyke // Studia Slavica Hungarica. 1970. T. XVI. № 3-4. C. 219-236.
  9. Usmanov R. Sh. Parametricheskaya kategorizatsiya ad"ektivnoi leksiki (na materiale prilagatel'nykh, oboznachayushchikh "obshchii razmer"): diss. … k. filol. n. / Bashkirskii gosudarstvennyi universitet. Ufa, 2009. 258 s.
  10. Chenki A. Semantika v kognitivnoi lingvistike // Fundamental'nye napravleniya sovremennoi amerikanskoi lingvistiki: sbornik obzorov. M.: Izd. MGU, 1997. S. 340-369.
  11. Shcherbak A. M. Ocherki po sravnitel'noi morfologii tyurkskikh yazykov (Glagol). L.: Nauka, 1987. 183 s.
  12. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English: For Advanced Learners. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. 478 p.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru