PRAGMALINGUISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE SOCIOLOGICAL DISCOURSE
Tarnaeva Larisa Petrovna, Lyubshina Marina Vladimirovna
Saint Petersburg University
Submitted: 19.08.2018
Abstract. The article deals with the pragmalinguistic characteristics of the English-language sociological discourse. The definition of sociological discourse as verbal communication between the subjects included in the field of professional activity is given, the factors that mediate the specificity of this type of discourse are identified, and its attributive features are singled out and described: spheres of functioning, standard participants, chronotopes, communicative strategies and speech tactics that are used by participants in professional communication in the field of social relations.
Key words and phrases: англоязычный социологический дискурс, хронотопы, аргументативные, контактоформирующие и прескриптивно-прогностические стратегии, речевые тактики, направления социологических исследований, English-language sociological discourse, chronotopes, argumentative, contact-forming and prescriptive-prognostic strategies, speech tactics, directions of sociological research
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Arutyunova N. D. Pragmatika // Yazykoznanie. Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / gl. red. V. N. Yartseva. M.: Bol'shaya Rossiiskaya entsiklopediya, 1990. S. 389-390.
Bachinin V. A. Sotsiologiya: akademicheskii kurs. M.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova "Yuridicheskii tsentr "Press"", 2004. 871 s.
Beilinson L. S. Professional'nyi diskurs kak predmet lingvisticheskogo izucheniya // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 1 (9). S. 145-149.
Bykova O. N. Yazykovoe manipulirovanie: materialy k entsiklopedicheskomu slovaryu "Kul'tura russkoi rechi" // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty rechevogo obshcheniya. Vestnik Rossiiskoi ritoricheskoi assotsiatsii. 1999. Vyp. 1. S. 91-103.
Voevoda E. V. Teoriya i metodika professional'noi yazykovoi podgotovki spetsialistov-mezhdunarodnikov v Rossii: avtoref. diss.. d. ped. n. M., 2011. 38 s.
Deik T. A. van. Diskurs i vlast': reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii. M.: URSS; LIBROKOM, 2015. 352 s.
Klyuev E. V. Rechevaya kommunikatsiya: uspeshnost' rechevogo vzaimodeistviya. M.: RIPOL Klassik, 2002. 320 s.
Kul'turologiya. KhKh vek: entsiklopediya: v 2-kh t. / gl. red. S. Ya. Levit. SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga; Aleteiya, 1998. T. 2. 446 s.
Kurlov A. B. Osnovy teorii kommunikatsii: uchebnoe posobie. Ufa: RIO BashGU, 2002. 124 s.
Noveishii filosofskii slovar' / sost. A. A. Gritsanov. Mn.: Izd. V. M. Skakun, 1998. 896 s.
Popova E. S. Struktura manipulyativnogo vozdeistviya v reklamnom tekste // Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2002. № 24. S. 276-288.
Romanov A. A. Sistemnyi analiz regulyativnykh sredstv dialogicheskogo obshcheniya. M.: IYa AN SSSR, 1988. 183 s.
Sedov K. F. Tipy yazykovykh lichnostei i strategii rechevogo povedeniya // Voprosy stilistiki: sb. statei. Saratov: Izd-vo SGU, 1996. Vyp. 26. Yazyk i chelovek. S. 8-14.
Susov I. P. K predmetu pragmalingvistiki // Soderzhatel'nye aspekty predlozheniya i teksta: muzhvuz. temat. sb. / otv. red. I. P. Susov. Kalinin: Izd-vo Kalininskogo gos. un-ta, 1983. S. 3-15.
Tarnaeva L. P. Perevod v sfere delovogo obshcheniya: dialog yazykov i kul'tur (lingvodidakticheskii aspekt): monografiya. SPb.: Knizhnyi dom, 2017. 134 s.
Shelestyuk E. V. Rechevoe vozdeistvie: ontologiya i metodologiya issledovaniya: monografiya. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2014. 344 s.
Burawoy M. For Public Sociology // American Sociological Review. 2005. Vol. 70. P. 4-28.
Foster T. B. The persistent black-white gap in and weakening link between expecting to move and actually moving // Sociology of Race and Ethnicity. 2018. Vol. 4 (3). P. 353-370.
Giddens A. A call to arms. Why, during a period of transformative social change, is sociology not back at the forefront of intellectual life and public debate? [Elektronnyi resurs] // Guardian. 2006. November 26. URL: https://www.theguardian. com/commentisfree/2006/nov/26/post682 (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2018).
Lichter D. T. The Unsuccessful Family Experiment [Elektronnyi resurs] // Pathways. 2018. P. 9-12. URL: https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Pathways_Winter2018_Family-Experiment.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2018).
Mckenzie L. People shouldn’t have to feel grateful for social housing - it’s a basic human right [Elektronnyi resurs] // Guardian. 2017. August 11. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2017/aug/11/grateful-social-housing-human-right (data obrashcheniya: 04.08.2018).
Tack C., Small A. M. and M. L. Making Friends in Violent Neighborhoods: Strategies among Elementary School Children // Sociological Science. 2017. Vol. 4. P. 224-248.
Ward Z. J., Long M. W., Resch S. C., Giles C. M., Cradock A. L., Gortmaker S. L. Simulation of growth trajectories of childhood obesity into adulthood // New England Journal of Medicine. 2017. № 377 (22). P. 2145-2153.
Whyte W. F. Street Corner Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. 398+XX p.
Русский
